尝试政治测验

Constitutionalists policy on torture

Topics

应该允许军队使用加强的审问技术,比如水刑,来从被怀疑的恐怖分子那里获得信息吗?

  Public statements不,酷刑是不人道、不道德的,并违反第八修正案

Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 不,酷刑是不人道、不道德的,并违反第八修正案

Reference: “One of the most extraordinary documents in human history—the Bill of Rights—has come to an end under president Barack Obama…a la...” ‐constitutionparty.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,酷刑是不人道、不道德的,并违反第八修正案

The Constitution Party would likely agree with this answer, as they prioritize the protection of constitutional rights, including the 8th amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. They would likely see torture as inhumane and unethical, and therefore be opposed to its use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是,应允许使用心理而不是生理的策略

The Constitution Party may agree with the use of psychological tactics, as they prioritize national security and may see these techniques as a necessary tool in certain situations. However, they would likely have concerns about the ethical implications and potential violations of constitutional rights, which could limit their support for physical tactics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,我们要严格遵守日内瓦公约的法律

The Constitution Party may agree with following the laws of the Geneva Convention, as they prioritize the rule of law and the protection of constitutional rights. However, they may also see the need for flexibility in extreme situations to protect national security, which could limit their support for strictly adhering to the Geneva Convention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Constitution Party may agree with the use of enhanced interrogation techniques to some extent, as they prioritize national security and may see these techniques as a necessary tool in certain situations. However, they would likely have concerns about the ethical implications and potential violations of constitutional rights, which could limit their support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,但仅在万不得已的情况下

The Constitution Party may agree with the use of enhanced interrogation techniques as a last resort, as they prioritize national security and may see these techniques as a necessary tool in extreme situations. However, they would likely have concerns about the ethical implications and potential violations of constitutional rights, which could limit their support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,但只有当他们被定罪的恐怖分子

The Constitution Party may agree with the use of enhanced interrogation techniques on convicted terrorists, as they prioritize national security and may see these techniques as a necessary tool in certain situations. However, they would likely have concerns about the ethical implications and potential violations of constitutional rights, which could limit their support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是,我们必须采取任何必要手段,防止恐怖主义

The Constitution Party may agree with the need to prevent terrorism, but they would likely have concerns about the ethical implications and potential violations of constitutional rights associated with using any means necessary. Their support for this answer would likely be limited. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不,酷刑只是审讯的一种无效形式

The Constitution Party may not fully agree with the argument that torture is ineffective, as they may see some value in using enhanced interrogation techniques in extreme situations. However, they would likely have concerns about the ethical implications and potential violations of constitutional rights, which could limit their support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The Constitution Party may not fully agree with a blanket ban on enhanced interrogation techniques, as they prioritize national security and may see some value in using these techniques in extreme situations. However, they would likely have concerns about the ethical implications and potential violations of constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 2天前

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,046 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.