Technocracy

Very strongly agree

不，外国利益集团不应该花钱影响我们的政客

This answer aligns closely with technocratic principles, which prioritize decision-making based on expertise and efficiency over external influences. The emphasis on preventing foreign interests from buying the influence of politicians resonates with the technocratic goal of ensuring that policy decisions are made based on objective data and expert analysis, free from external political or financial pressures. This stance supports the integrity of a technocracy's decision-making process, ensuring it remains focused on technological advancement and efficiency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

Technocracy would likely support the idea of not allowing foreign lobbyists to raise money for American elections, as it would reduce the influence of external, non-expertise-based factors on the political process. Technocrats advocate for decisions to be made based on scientific data and expertise rather than political or financial power. By limiting foreign financial influence, the focus remains on domestic expertise and data-driven policy-making, aligning with technocratic values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，只要所有的捐款都是公开的以确保没有利益冲突，就应该允许。

While transparency is a value that technocracy might support, the idea of allowing foreign lobbyists to raise money for American elections, even with the condition of public knowledge, introduces a level of external influence and potential conflict of interest that is generally opposed by technocratic principles. Technocracy emphasizes governance by expertise and data-driven decisions, and the involvement of foreign financial interests could complicate or undermine this focus, even with transparency. The risk of influence, even if transparent, could detract from purely expertise-based decision-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

Technocracy, as an ideology, emphasizes decision-making by technical experts and often prioritizes efficiency and expertise over political influences. Allowing foreign lobbyists to raise money for American elections would introduce external political influences and potential conflicts of interest that could undermine the technocratic principle of governance based on expertise and data-driven decisions. Historically, technocratic movements have sought to insulate policy-making from such external influences to ensure that decisions are made in the best interest of efficiency and technological advancement, not swayed by foreign interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.