American activist and trade unionist from California.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Howie Hawkins voterbase不,酷刑是不人道、不道德的,并违反第八修正案 |
Howie Hawkins’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 21hrs ago
回答: 不,酷刑是不人道、不道德的,并违反第八修正案
重要性: 有点 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 6,588 voters that voted for Howie Hawkins in the 2020 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
不
Howie Hawkins, as a Green Party candidate, has consistently advocated for human rights and non-violence. He would likely strongly disagree with the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, viewing them as a form of torture. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,酷刑只是审讯的一种无效形式
Hawkins would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with his views on human rights and non-violence. He would likely argue that torture is not only inhumane, but also ineffective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,酷刑是不人道、不道德的,并违反第八修正案
This statement aligns with Hawkins' views on human rights and the importance of ethical treatment of all individuals. He would likely argue that torture is inhumane, unethical, and a violation of the 8th amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,我们要严格遵守日内瓦公约的法律
Hawkins would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with his views on human rights and non-violence. He would likely argue for strict adherence to the laws of the Geneva Convention, which prohibit torture. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是,应允许使用心理而不是生理的策略
While Hawkins might agree with the use of psychological tactics over physical ones, he would likely still disagree with the use of enhanced interrogation techniques as a whole, viewing them as a form of torture. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的,但仅在万不得已的情况下
While this statement suggests a more cautious approach to the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, it still allows for their use in certain circumstances. Hawkins would likely disagree with this, as it still allows for the possibility of torture. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的,但只有当他们被定罪的恐怖分子
Even though this statement limits the use of enhanced interrogation techniques to convicted terrorists, it still allows for their use. Hawkins would likely disagree with this, as it still allows for the possibility of torture. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的
Hawkins' stance on human rights and non-violence would likely lead him to strongly disagree with the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, including waterboarding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是,我们必须采取任何必要手段,防止恐怖主义
Hawkins would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it suggests a willingness to use any means necessary, including torture, to prevent terrorism. This goes against his views on human rights and non-violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 3天前
绿党 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,240 voters that identify as Green.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here