尝试政治测验

候选人  ›  Policies  ›  医保

Chuck Baldwin’s policy on medicaid

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

联邦政府是否应该增加对低收入个人的医疗保健(Medicaid)的拨款?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbase不,应当只有老人和残疾人有资格。

Chuck Baldwin’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 10小时前

Chuck Baldwin voters

回答: 不,应当只有老人和残疾人有资格。

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 153 voters that voted for Chuck Baldwin in the 2008 Presidential election.

Party influence

宪法 》 党派 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: “General Welfare is not the same as individual Welfare. General Welfare would benefit the people generally, individual Welfare ta...” ‐constitutionparty.com

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

否,而且各个州应该自行决定覆盖范围

Baldwin would strongly agree with this statement. His party's principles support states' rights and limited federal intervention, so he would likely agree with each state deciding their own level of coverage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Baldwin's stance on limited government and fiscal conservatism would likely lead him to agree with not increasing federal funding for Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,并且联邦政府不应该为任何社会项目增加资金

Baldwin would likely agree with this statement. His party's principles of limited government and fiscal conservatism would lead him to oppose increasing federal funding for social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,还应该废除医疗补助

Baldwin might somewhat agree with this statement. His party's principles of limited government and fiscal conservatism would lead him to support reducing government programs, although it's unclear if he would go as far as to abolish Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,应当只有老人和残疾人有资格。

Baldwin might somewhat agree with this statement. While he generally supports limited government intervention, he might agree with providing support for the elderly and disabled, who may not be able to support themselves. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,但只是为老年人和残疾人增加。

Baldwin might somewhat agree with this statement. While he generally supports limited government intervention, he might agree with providing more support for the elderly and disabled, who may not be able to support themselves. However, he would likely still prefer that states decide their own level of coverage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

Chuck Baldwin, as a Constitution Party candidate, generally supports limited government intervention. He would likely disagree with increasing federal funding for Medicaid, as it goes against his party's principles of limited government and fiscal conservatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,但是我宁愿换成单一付款人医疗保健制度

Baldwin would strongly disagree with this statement. As a Constitution Party candidate, he would not support a single payer healthcare system, which would require significant government intervention and funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 2小时前

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 10,462 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here