Under a provision of the Patriot Act the NSA is allowed to collect phone metadata — the numbers, time stamps, and duration of a call, but not its actual content. Opponents include civil liberties advocates and Senator Rand Paul who argue that the collection is unconstitutional since it is done without a warrant. Supporters of the collection argue that the collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 27.7k Fulton voters.
33% Yes |
67% No |
27% Yes |
51% No |
6% Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists |
14% No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity |
2% No, and abolish the NSA |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 27.7k Fulton voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 27.7k Fulton voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Fulton voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@8SRZSQK4yrs4Y
No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity and abolish the NSA fbi Cia ntf open area 51
@8F3MHJ95yrs5Y
No, this is an unconstitutional invasion of privacy, not to mention the potential racism and sexism that could result from this.
@B3SBP9S2wks2W
Yes, as long as they do not collect any further personal information than just the number and basic call information.
@9VBSTLV6mos6MO
yes but also no it just depends like in case of a threat or something in call they would hear about it
@9V9Z2WN6mos6MO
I feel like there should have to be a reason that they would need to start moderating that individual. fits necessary to that individual then yes, but they shouldn't be able to do it to just anybody
@9SGFY8P7mos7MO
no never, only when its actually a threat to either the united states, building, people, or a murder happened then its okay to search but anything else no
@Yaunti2 8mos8MO
No, while basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists, the NSA should be abolished and funds reallocate to the U.N. or a similar organization
@9RN3C9X8mos8MO
No, because they already are and they're doing nothing to prosecute scammers when they already have all the necessary data to do so. Even if it is done, it would take a warrant and probable cause.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “NSA Domestic Surveillance” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.