Genetic engineering involves modifying the DNA of organisms to prevent or treat diseases. Proponents argue that it could lead to breakthroughs in curing genetic disorders and improving public health. Opponents argue that it raises ethical concerns and potential risks of unintended consequences.
Response rates from 388 Lexington-Fayette voters.
74% Yes |
26% No |
74% Yes |
26% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 388 Lexington-Fayette voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 388 Lexington-Fayette voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Lexington-Fayette voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9RJH6B8 12mos12MO
Yes, while ensuring ethical research that does not lead to supporting ideals such as selective reproduction or eugenics
@clbcarman 12mos12MO
Yes, but only to treat agreed-upon classified diseases, as going beyond this is a slippery slope to eugenics.
@9QT5LY3 12mos12MO
Yes, however only after ensuring their is no risks in doing so and also at the consent of the people
@9TM97YS10mos10MO
Yes but they need to be very careful and only use research for diseases because this could easily lead to dark places like eugenics.
@9WCWFBK9mos9MO
Yes, so long as the general public are not subject to it without their consent or knowledge. Fluoridation and its origin being a good example as to why health being in the hands of the federal government with the absolute final say is a bad idea.
@9PPZHFZ1yr1Y
No, as this could be misused for eugenics purposes.
@9S739LH11mos11MO
Yes, however the government should also fund programs for lifestyle changes that can help to prevent and treat diseases
@9ZGX9KJ 8mos8MO
Yes, while ensuring ethical research does not lead to supporting ideals such as selective reproduction or eugenics.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH12mos12MO
