+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 23.9k America voters.

35%
Yes
65%
No
35%
Yes
65%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 23.9k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 23.9k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9RH228W  from Maine  answered…7mos7MO

No, but there should be a process whereby such access can be granted if the appropriate federal warrant is given and ONLY for matters of national security.

 @9RBBBSQ  from Alabama  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but access should only be granted in the case of emergencies (it should not be always accessible)

 @9T5V463 from Arizona  answered…6mos6MO

Only in the use of a committed crime and if there is credible information of threats that would put lives in danger

  @DylanJMcCombs03  from South Carolina  answered…3mos3MO

No, this infringes dangerously on an individual's right to privacy and has the potential for serious misuse.

 @9SV9J3J from Missouri  answered…6mos6MO

While it could be helpful, it would be taking away privacy and security which could be used corruptly by those in power.

 @9PZ2HB5 from New Jersey  answered…8mos8MO

No, the government should have their own tech to do so or give tech companies the option and negotiate a deal with tech companies so that they are fairly compensated.

 @B32C7VP from New York  answered…1wk1W

Yes but if only if the person is convicted of a crime and the police need access to information on the device

 @B2ZVFJR from New York  answered…1wk1W

Yes but only if the person has been convicted of a crime and the police need evidence on the accused persons device.