Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.6k San Diego voters.

75%
Yes
25%
No
75%
Yes
25%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.6k San Diego voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.6k San Diego voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from San Diego voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9N8XVGK from Alaska  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only in areas where such a development is economically beneficial, such as the northeast corridor.

 @9L4Z23B  from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, the federal government should issue grants and PABs for states with projects on designated high speed corridors (186+ MPH MAS, 155 MPH Average Speed) and higher speed corridors (110-125 MPH MAS, 90-110 MPH Average Speed). States should utilize P3s to help increase efficiency of project development

 @B4DHRZM from Michigan  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but they should make sure it doesn't harm any communities and towns where the train will pass through

 @9WSQRB5 from Michigan  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, the government should build and operate them with provisions for lifetime funding and absolute protection against privatization.

 @9X9Q7KB from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

This is a silly idea in our country. This method of transportation works in other countries because they're small. This would not work in the United States because we are geographically massive.

 @9NNC8HX from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, if they get rid of other public transportation as a way to replace it and truly make its impact effective

 @9S7D47M from Texas  answered…11mos11MO

The government should provide subsidies for the development of high-speed rail networks as long as they are reviewed and meet safety standards.

 @9X682Q6 from California  answered…8mos8MO

Depends on the area, most of the united states wouldn't benefit from rail networks and is much more reliant on cars. The government should focus instead on improving electric charging infrastructure