+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.5k California voters.

54%
Yes
46%
No
54%
Yes
46%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.5k California voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.5k California voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from California voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9GN5KWP from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

No, but they should be kept somewhere safe like a migrant-specific shelter with all basic necessities provided until they’re thoroughly screened and cleared

 @9M4G5FW from Maryland  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, except for harmless refugees from persecution, and deport immigrants who incite hate or terrorism

 @9NTH43Q from North Carolina  answered…6mos6MO

Not banned, but they should be kept somewhere safe with all basic necessities provided until their background check is completed

  @9GSFFG2 from Massachusetts  answered…1yr1Y

No, but increase background checks for immigrants coming from countries with totalitarian governments or high crime rates.

 @9QRZ2Y3 from Maryland  answered…5mos5MO

No but all immigrants regardless of where they are from should undergo security screenings and checks.

 @9VJZYWB from Maryland  answered…2mos2MO

No, the vast majority of prospective immigrants are regular people, and this unjustly turns them away. Plus, there is no real definition of a high risk country.

 @9GQFBJM from Massachusetts  answered…1yr1Y

No, but there should be a deeper vetting of visas and those entering from that country to prevent potential terrorists from entering the country

 @9ZZWH6N from Texas  answered…5 days5D

I belive records of the migrating person should be provided to help prove if they're innocent of any crimes.