+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 205 Congressional District 7 voters.

61%
Yes
39%
No
61%
Yes
39%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 205 Congressional District 7 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 205 Congressional District 7 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Congressional District 7 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9GN5KWP from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

No, but they should be kept somewhere safe like a migrant-specific shelter with all basic necessities provided until they’re thoroughly screened and cleared

 @9M4G5FW from Maryland  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, except for harmless refugees from persecution, and deport immigrants who incite hate or terrorism

 @9NTH43Q from North Carolina  answered…6mos6MO

Not banned, but they should be kept somewhere safe with all basic necessities provided until their background check is completed

  @9GSFFG2 from Massachusetts  answered…1yr1Y

No, but increase background checks for immigrants coming from countries with totalitarian governments or high crime rates.

 @9QRZ2Y3 from Maryland  answered…5mos5MO

No but all immigrants regardless of where they are from should undergo security screenings and checks.

 @9VJZYWB from Maryland  answered…2mos2MO

No, the vast majority of prospective immigrants are regular people, and this unjustly turns them away. Plus, there is no real definition of a high risk country.

 @9GQFBJM from Massachusetts  answered…1yr1Y

No, but there should be a deeper vetting of visas and those entering from that country to prevent potential terrorists from entering the country

 @9ZZWH6N from Texas  answered…1wk1W

I belive records of the migrating person should be provided to help prove if they're innocent of any crimes.