@ISIDEWITHQuestionselectionsStarted 2yrs agoActive 2wks ago

Should every voter automatically receive a mail in ballot?

Absentee-by-mail ballots are paper ballots that are mailed to voters who must then fill them out and return them, often with the voter's signature and sometimes a witness signature to prove the voter's identity.  In 35 states and Washington, D.C., any qualified voter may vote absentee-by-mail without offering an excuse, and in the remaining states, an excuse is required.  For example, Georgia allows anyone to vote by mail while voters in New York can’t vote absentee by mail unless they are out of town on Election Day, ill, disabled, taking care of someone who is ill or disabled, in a Veterans Health Administration hospital, or in jail for a non felony offense.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Cook (Illinois)

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 961 Cook voters.

43%
Yes
57%
No
39%
Yes
42%
No
2%
Yes, but add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification
12%
No, mail in ballots should only be used by voters who are physically incapable of making it to a polling location
2%
Yes, and making voting compulsory
3%
No, and add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 961 Cook voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 961 Cook voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Cook voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9DLF5TX  from Nevada  answered…1yr1Y

No, only if requested.

 @9FDPQWW from Alabama  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but we should create an online alternative to where you can either vote from a Government monitored website or app to vote.

 @9CCDGPS from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, upon request

 @9DCBMGJ from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

No, mail in ballots should be abolished

 @9DF5VBN from New York  answered…1yr1Y

Abolish democracy

 @9F56K6Z from Utah  answered…1yr1Y

No. This has compromised elections and has made the majority of the public not trust the outcomes.

 @9BLQ5YS from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but make voting compulsory

 @9CRZVKL from Washington  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, and make voting compulsory but add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Mail in ballots” news articles, updated frequently.

  @Fox-News submitted…1mo1MO

Battleground state's top court cancels ballot extension

▲  32 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1mo1MO

Pennsylvania's Election Nightmare: Machines Fail, Trust on Trial in Cambria County

A ballot printing issue led to widespread voting problems in Cambria County, Pennsylvania Tuesday morning, according to officials.Cambria County Commissioner Scott Hunt confirmed that the voting problem was caused by how the ballots were printed, and not a problem with the machines. He confirmed to WJAC that mail-in ballots are not affected by this problem.County Solicitor Ron Repak said the machine would not read the ballot markings, based on how they were printed adding they conducted tests before Election Day, but because of the nature of the problem, the mistake was not able to be discovered until voting commenced.Repak is urging voters to continue to cast their ballots and trust that their votes will be counted.First, elections officials are hand counting ballots that were delivered into drop boxes earlier Tuesday. Second, they have express voting machines to help speed up the process. Third, officials have ordered additional ballots and hope to commence with normal voting by Tuesday afternoon.A court order has extended voting times from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. in Cambria County. In the filing, election officials reported that the Electronic Voting System in Cambria County experienced a software malfunction, which prevented voters from scanning their completed ballots.Until the issue can be solved, county election officials report that voters can fill out their paper ballot and have it placed in a secure and locked drop box.Voters reported that some polling places were not following that directive earlier, instead turning people away and telling them to come back later.Repak said that poll watchers are on site to guarantee that ballots are secured. He also said that Cambria County will now be using express voting machines to help voters get through the lines faster.It's unclear how long it will take to resolve the problem, but Repak confirmed there are measures in place to make sure everyone can vote.

▲  47 replies

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3wks3W

Donald Trump nominates Pam Bondi as the next Attorney General

Former President and 2024 Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has announced his intention to nominate former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi as the next Attorney General of the United States, should he reclaim the presidency in the upcoming election.Bondi, a prominent figure in Republican politics, served as Florida's Attorney General from 2011 to 2019. She gained national attention for her legal battles on issues such as health care reform, consumer protection, and opioid abuse litigation. Known for her steadfast support of Trump during his presidency, Bondi also served as a key adviser during his first impeachment trial, where she defended his administration against accusations of abuse of power.In a statement released by his campaign, Trump praised Bondi’s “unwavering commitment to justice” and her “track record of standing up for everyday Americans against the abuses of Washington’s elites.”“Pam Bondi has been a fearless advocate for the people, and she embodies the principles of fairness, accountability, and the rule of law that are sorely needed to restore trust in our justice system,” Trump said. “She is the right person to lead the Department of Justice into a new era of integrity and excellence.”While Bondi’s nomination has been met with applause from conservative circles, it has also reignited criticism from Democrats and ethics watchdogs. Her acceptance of a $25,000 donation from the Trump Foundation in 2013, which coincided with her decision not to pursue an investigation into Trump University, has drawn scrutiny in the past and resurfaced following the announcement.Democratic leaders have already voiced opposition, questioning Bondi’s ability to lead the Department of Justice independently. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) called the nomination “a political power play” and urged a focus on “restoring integrity, not entrenching partisanship.”

▲  2317 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3wks3W

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1023 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3 days3D

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies