+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.8k California voters.

41%
Yes
59%
No
33%
Yes
51%
No
8%
Yes, but only for cryptocurrencies that hold stable value without price fluctuation
5%
No, classify cryptocurrencies as unregulated commodities
2%
No, but the government should create an official digital currency
1%
No, classify cryptocurrencies as highly regulated securities

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.8k California voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.8k California voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from California voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian  from South Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Sellers and consumers should be able to determine which methods of payment best suit their transactional needs.

 @9D56Z6D from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should have no say or control what so ever as to what is or is not a form of currency or payment.

 @988C9KW from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

No, classify them as a Ponzi scheme(pyramid scheme), and take criminal action against those who promote them.

 @B2FDCLR from California  answered…2mos2MO

It depends on the governmental structure and economic makeup of the country, as it could theoretically be a good form of currency for some types of economies.

 @B28JPPG from North Carolina  answered…2mos2MO

No, but because there should be no government intervention in the market, people should be allowed to use whatever they see fit as a form of currency.

 @9FR2KGHfrom Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

Yes and it is not the government's place to allow or disallow forms of payment among private parties

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Cryptocurrency” news articles, updated frequently.