@ISIDEWITHQuestionsHealthcareStarted 4yrs agoActive 6mos ago

Should the government issue vaccine passports?

Vaccine passports offer proof of immunity to people who have been inoculated with a vaccine. The concept gained traction after 2 vaccines were introduced to help combat the Coronavirus pandemic in November 2020. A vaccine passport would allow individuals to stop wearing masks if they could they have been inoculated and so aren’t a risk to others. Countries could require foreign visitors to have the passports in order to cross their border and restaurants, theaters and offices may make them mandatory in order to enter their premises. More than a dozen countries including Ghana and Nigeria currently require proof of vaccination against yellow fever before they are issued a visa.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Pennsylvania

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 370 Pennsylvania voters.

54%
Yes
46%
No
46%
Yes
46%
No
4%
Yes, but only for international travel
1%
No, we are too early into the pandemic to decide this
2%
Yes, as long as they are not mandatory
2%
Yes, but everyone should still wear a mask

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 370 Pennsylvania voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 370 Pennsylvania voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Pennsylvania voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8QYLSDZ from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

No, vaccines should be entirely personal choice. It is fair for a company to require vaccination or for airlines to restrict travel but there should be no vaccine requirement, that interferes with a person's autonomy.

 @8Q272XN from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

No, multiple cases of individuals being reinfected by COVID-19 have been confirmed and thus immunity passports are meaningless.

 @Juminsel from Oklahoma  answered…4yrs4Y

No, this too easily slides into regulating all facets of an individual's life.

 @8QQN4TH from California  answered…4yrs4Y

NO. Vaccinations should not be mandatory, it is a violation of of human rights and the Nuremberg Code. Many people are frightened of vaccinations, and rightly so, they should have the right of choice. Further, if vaccinations are forced (mandatory) and vaccination companies are not held liable for the safety of their products, it is even more abominable and DRACONIAN to force someone to accept a vaccination. It is downright morally reprehensible.

 @8QKRFD7 from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the government should not restrict movement on any basis

 @8QKFZQ9 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

The government should have zero regulation over free movement

 @8QK956V from Tennessee  answered…4yrs4Y

No this is the first step to tyranny.

 @8QJW6BH from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the government has been getting too much control since the pandemic

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1mo1MO

Billion-Dollar Bust: Kamala’s Campaign Drowns in Debt After Star-Studded Spending Spree

Kamala Harris's campaign ended with at least $20 million in debt, per two sources familiar. Harris raised over $1 billion and had $118 million in the bank as of Oct. 16.Rob Flaherty, this staffer said, is currently shopping around the Kamala fundraising email list to anyone who wants it to try to raise the money back. This includes other campaigns and outside groups.Flaherty is the deputy campaign manager and reports to Jen O’Malley Dillon.“Jen blew through a billion dollars in a few months and it was all Jen’s idea to do all the concerts.” — Kamala campaign adviser told meThis source added that O’Malley Dillon did these “concerts,” like Katy Perry, Lizzo, Eminem, Bruce Springsteen et cetera at the expense of “prioritizing and spending money on social media and other campaign priorities.”Apparently a group in Georgia had to lay off 100 people because they couldn’t pay them. It’s unclear at this time if the campaign PAID the talent to perform but the cost of production for the events was “immense.”What’s more, this Kamala campaign staffer said several people who were working for the Kamala Harris for President campaign are still awaiting several overdue payments they were promised for their work. IE, they didn’t pay the staff.“People didn’t like working with her. Many people on the campaign felt like we lost because Kamala wasn’t allowed to run her campaign. They were running Joe Biden’s campaign instead of a Kamala campaign. Obnoxious and very much a gate keeper and interfering with the vice president’s people who were trying to do their job.”

▲  2611 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4wks4W

Donald Trump nominates Pam Bondi as the next Attorney General

Former President and 2024 Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has announced his intention to nominate former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi as the next Attorney General of the United States, should he reclaim the presidency in the upcoming election.Bondi, a prominent figure in Republican politics, served as Florida's Attorney General from 2011 to 2019. She gained national attention for her legal battles on issues such as health care reform, consumer protection, and opioid abuse litigation. Known for her steadfast support of Trump during his presidency, Bondi also served as a key adviser during his first impeachment trial, where she defended his administration against accusations of abuse of power.In a statement released by his campaign, Trump praised Bondi’s “unwavering commitment to justice” and her “track record of standing up for everyday Americans against the abuses of Washington’s elites.”“Pam Bondi has been a fearless advocate for the people, and she embodies the principles of fairness, accountability, and the rule of law that are sorely needed to restore trust in our justice system,” Trump said. “She is the right person to lead the Department of Justice into a new era of integrity and excellence.”While Bondi’s nomination has been met with applause from conservative circles, it has also reignited criticism from Democrats and ethics watchdogs. Her acceptance of a $25,000 donation from the Trump Foundation in 2013, which coincided with her decision not to pursue an investigation into Trump University, has drawn scrutiny in the past and resurfaced following the announcement.Democratic leaders have already voiced opposition, questioning Bondi’s ability to lead the Department of Justice independently. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) called the nomination “a political power play” and urged a focus on “restoring integrity, not entrenching partisanship.”

▲  2317 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3wks3W

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1023 replies