+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 221 State Senate District 3 voters.

56%
Yes
44%
No
47%
Yes
36%
No
5%
Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory
8%
No, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination
3%
Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics
1%
Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 221 State Senate District 3 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 221 State Senate District 3 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from State Senate District 3 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8HCZLY5 from Iowa  answered…4yrs4Y

No, it should not be required. It should be an option and the choice of the business.

 @8HZBKRB from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics and extend the requirement to private companies as well

 @8NR3ZY3 from Alabama  answered…4yrs4Y

No, and there is no proof that racial sensitivity training actually has a positive effect on racial sensitivity.

 @Presspacenut from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and include LGBTQ+ topics and extend this requirement to private companies as well.

 @8TGMPJR from New Jersey  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8KBQ6ZY from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and they should include LGBTQ+ topics, cover all protected groups, and extend the requirement to private companies as well.

 @8HZ5PCR from California  answered…4yrs4Y