+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 30.3k State Senate District 15 voters.

36%
Yes
64%
No
28%
Yes
49%
No
5%
Yes, but increase oversight
9%
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
3%
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas
6%
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 30.3k State Senate District 15 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 30.3k State Senate District 15 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from State Senate District 15 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8KZ52SJ from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8D7X8VB from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, apply appropriate oversight, no subsidies, and mandate cost of energy = cost to produce energy + cost to environment/cleanup .

 @8N5DRPD from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @9VJZZCG from Maryland  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but only for now, not in the long term. We can’t realistically switch to clean energy at the snap of a finger, so we should use it now but gradually decrease it as we taper off fossil fuels in general in favor of green energy.

 @98DPQVY from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9XPRF7L from Ohio  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, with oversight to ensure public health is being negatively affected. Should move toward renewable energy

 @9WZJ35X from New York  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but companies should be held liable for negligence and damages to property and human life. Also, no more industry secrets. Citizens have a right to know what chemicals are being pumped into the soil.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Fracking” news articles, updated frequently.