+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 9k State Senate District 2 voters.

40%
Yes
60%
No
32%
Yes
46%
No
5%
Yes, but increase oversight
8%
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
3%
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas
6%
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 9k State Senate District 2 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 9k State Senate District 2 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from State Senate District 2 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8KZ52SJ from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8D7X8VB from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, apply appropriate oversight, no subsidies, and mandate cost of energy = cost to produce energy + cost to environment/cleanup .

 @8N5DRPD from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @9VJZZCG from Maryland  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but only for now, not in the long term. We can’t realistically switch to clean energy at the snap of a finger, so we should use it now but gradually decrease it as we taper off fossil fuels in general in favor of green energy.

 @98DPQVY from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9XPRF7L from Ohio  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, with oversight to ensure public health is being negatively affected. Should move toward renewable energy

 @9WZJ35X from New York  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but companies should be held liable for negligence and damages to property and human life. Also, no more industry secrets. Citizens have a right to know what chemicals are being pumped into the soil.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Fracking” news articles, updated frequently.