+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Animal Testing

Answer Overview

Response rates from 345 Boston voters.

62%
Yes
38%
No
44%
Yes
38%
No
19%
Yes, but not for cosmetics

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 345 Boston voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 345 Boston voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Boston voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8M2N46D from Missouri  answered…4yrs4Y

No, not for cosmetics. Drugs should only be tested on animals if it is believed that the drug could improve the animal's health.

 @89S67K7 from Kansas  answered…4yrs4Y

No, use inmates that are serving life or death sentences and offer incentives for other inmates to volunteer.

 @8PW2KJP  from Louisiana  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, animal testing is necessary for understanding the safety and proper dosages of new medicines and treatments. It would be dangerous and extremely unethical for scientists to test drugs on humans before making sure they are safe. Even though the testing might be harmful to the tested animal, I believe its sacrifice advances developments on medicine that could save millions of lives, both human and not.

 @9B3BGKK from Oregon  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9HB5MKV from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but never for superficial discoveries and only if the animals suffer zero pain or distress whatsoever

 @9N92GYS from North Carolina  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but never for superficial discoveries like cosmetics and only if the animals suffer zero discomfort