+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 3.7k Johnson voters.

44%
Yes
56%
No
34%
Yes
46%
No
10%
Yes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing
10%
No, this will encourage people not to work and harm economic growth

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.7k Johnson voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 3.7k Johnson voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Johnson voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8HCHSRR from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

 @9HB5MKV from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but institute it gradually over a set transition period to prevent mass disruption. Start with state-based pilot programs like Alaska’s. Eventually, it should replace our current welfare system.

 @8LJM2HB from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, for all minors, elders (65+), pregnant women, new mothers, people with physical or mental issues, and students until they make a livable wage where they can support themselves.

 @9G9C49K from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but institute it gradually to prevent mass disruption, starting with state-based pilot programs such as Alaska’s. It should eventually replace our current welfare system

 @ISIDEWITHanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only in the form of a social dividend under a market socialist economy

 @92R5X3N from California  answered…3yrs3Y