@ISIDEWITHQuestionsenvironmentStarted 8yrs agoActive 5hrs ago

Should the government stop construction of the Dakota Access pipeline?

The Dakota Access pipeline is a 1,172 mile oil pipeline that stretches through North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa and southern Illinois. The pipeline would allow oil companies to transport crude oil from North Dakota to oil refineries along the Eastern Seaboard. The pipeline’s construction was permitted by the participating state governments under eminent domain. Opponents of the pipeline (including several Native American tribes, including the Meskwaki and Sioux tribal nations) argue that the pipeline has the potential to pollute their water supply and destroy Native American burial sites. Proponents argue that the pipeline is necessary for the U.S. to achieve energy independence.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Kay Ivey

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 309 Kay Ivey voters.

20%
Yes
80%
No
17%
Yes
64%
No
3%
Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain
14%
No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land
2%
No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 309 Kay Ivey voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 309 Kay Ivey voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Kay Ivey voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8JCJLWV from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Not enough knowledge to make an informed vote

  @Jones4Potus2024Independent  from Oregon  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, indigenous treaties must be respected and the environment protected

 @8N5DRPD from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Not as of yet

 @9D68NLB from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

No but should have to pay a land use fee to the Native Americans

 @9GJTNP9 from Maryland  answered…1yr1Y

Given the fact that climate change is a mounting problem the pipeline shouldn't be constructed. Moreover, eminent domain shouldn't be used to seize the land of indigenous people.

 @9D47SPK from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

No, we should find a more sustainable alternative.

 @9HRD7WF from California  answered…1yr1Y

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land. Additionally, extremely increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident.

 @9FQ8SPF from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

Drill, Baby, Drill

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

Active 4 days ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Trump's Deportation Storm: America Braces for Mass Exodus of Immigrants

For months, immigration advocates have been planning for the possibility of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, their worst fears have arrived.Immigrants’ rights groups have spent the last year preparing for a second Trump term and an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, analyzing Trump’s proposals, drafting legal briefs, coordinating messaging and organizing aid for immigrants and asylum seekers. They responded to Trump’s victory with alarm and vowed to put up a fight, setting the stage for four more years of contentious court battles with his administration.Some are already preparing to push current leadership at the Department of Homeland Security to take steps to stymie the incoming Trump team, particularly on immigrant detention and the use of AI in enforcement.“We should expect to see the devastation of immigrant communities all over the country. We should expect to see family separation,” said Kica Matos, the president of the National Immigration Law Center. “It is entirely possible that he will try to use the military to carry out deportations, so that means that Americans all over the country will see the military engaging in enforcement against civilian populations, which is horrifying.”Trump, after winning a historic victory on a platform of turbo-charged immigration enforcement, has said he will conduct mass deportations at a scale never before seen. Immigrant advocates have warned this would be expensive and inhumane, separating families and wrecking communities. The president-elect has also vowed to build huge detention camps, hire thousands more border agents, funnel military spending toward border security and invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without court hearings.He has also said he would end “catch-and-release” — allowing migrants to remain free, often with monitoring, while they await immigration court hearings — and restore a policy from his first term requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed. And he has dodged questions about whether he would try to bring back family separation.

▲  4333 replies