+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 485 Polk voters.

81%
Yes
19%
No
77%
Yes
14%
No
3%
Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies
4%
No, not until other countries increase their financial contributions
2%
No, it is obsolete and should be abolished

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 485 Polk voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 485 Polk voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Polk voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8HR8JJF from Iowa  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but the United States should not be responsible for funding 50% or more of NATO's operating budget.

 @8Q3YPW7 from Hawaii  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only on the condition that the other member states are required to maintain their budget quotas and armament preparation. The United States should no longer be the primary armer and cash cow for the alliance.

 @9VJZZCG from Maryland  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, leaving would ruin our relationship with Europe and would be immoral anyway, it would essentially mean letting Russia just invade whoever they want.

 @8WBW8DY from Idaho  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9H8G2T4 from Tennessee  answered…1yr1Y

The NATO Call to arms should not be greater than the American Constitution and need for congress to declare wars.

 @9VHSZ98 from California  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but use it to exert more control over those countries and make them heavily increase their military spending and make them increase their military presence in key areas like the South China Sea, Taiwan, and Israel

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “NATO” news articles, updated frequently.