+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 572 State Senate District 31 voters.

52%
Yes
48%
No
46%
Yes
39%
No
7%
Yes, and we should eliminate it
5%
No, I am satisfied with the current rate
4%
No, and increase it at a progressive rate

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 572 State Senate District 31 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 572 State Senate District 31 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from State Senate District 31 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8NK6PJ6 from Kansas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8XLR4JX  from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

No, it should mirror a progressive tax equivalent to both the deceased and the inheritant’s respective incomes.

 @9RH3CPQ from Georgia  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, but only for people who live in the house they own. People who own multiple residences should have increased taxes.

 @9RR7JNS from Virginia  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, the tax system is too convoluted and a flat wealth tax should be considered as opposed to several different tax types

 @8ZMCHXD from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

it should progressively increase as the value of the estate grows higher. (small estate - no tax, medium - 10 to 20 percent - large, up to 45 percent

 @9VJZZCG from Maryland  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, and we should eliminate it because it hurts farmers and their families who don’t have the money to pay taxes on such large properties once the owner dies.

 @9RV4TYK from Idaho  answered…4mos4MO

Inheritance of anything other than real estate should be banned in order to limit the cycles of generational wealth and poverty. When they die, a person's assets should be reclaimed by the government and placed into the Universal Basic Income fund.