Should our country defend other NATO countries that maintain low military defense budgets relative to their GDP?

Experience that I share, but I don’t view the problem to be their own laziness, I view the problem to be what perpetuates it in the first place, and the far back roots of this issue.

They sure are. It's been claimed they're moving away from antagonistic Wolf Warrior to something more diplomatic and professional.

They have come somewhat near huge uprising at times the last year or two with previously unheard of mass protests too.

Hahahaha well at least we know you're a big tough guy. That much we know. Why does the thought of nuclear war give weird betas a massive erection?

"Laced em up" lol

Our national debt doesn’t have a deadline to be paid, only a risk if it is not. We have the money to pay it, it’s called the rich population. We can reduce it overtime, but once again, just as you claim I failed to mention other parts of your argument, you failed to mention that we have made a deal to finance it because that was the terms of the past confrontation with Russia. If we are willing to leave people in a country that has not been the aggressor to lack their own civil liberties, than we are simply a “freedom-for-me-but-not-for-thee” kind of country. Peace is…  Read more desirable, and as such, I hope that we can push Russia back enough that their government will be willing to negotiate, but, if Russia doesn’t stop attacking, we all die anyway. WW3 is a risk, a risk that we are less likely to have in comparison to the days of the Cold War. We are not sacrificing our own liberties to assist Ukraine, we are sacrificing money, money that will come back to us when Ukraine isn’t drowning in offensive soldiers and corruption. World War 3 isn’t as big of a risk as before, and Putin isn’t willing to cause global winter for a slab of land that used to be his. We can’t do nothing, we can’t go isolationist because if we do, BRICS will fill the void, and as they grow, we weaken. Then, no matter what america will be stuck in an endless war, this time at its own borders. It takes a world saying “That’s enough” to prevent a conflict, because if one weaker voice is all that speaks against Russia, then they will squash it like a bug. Our meager cost of subsidies has crippled Russia more than we could’ve dreamed in our long feud, and we are not the ones fighting. It is for our safety and the rest of the world’s that Russia is held back, and eventually, they will be pushed back enough to be forced to vy for peace.

Not yet. They just passed the law that denies passport services at embassy without military registration. Which means military age men hiding abroad will have their visas invalidated.

They will fight to the last Ukrainian, and Russia is fine with it. So 2 more years or so.

You know why Putin didn't invade while Trump was there ? Because for Trump, Putin had a much bigger mission, the reason why he helped him to win in 2016 = divide, weaken and destroy the USA from within. And by George, was Trump doing a good job and is still trying !

Russia’s political instability, economic collapse, and military aggression under Yeltsin made NATO members wary of integrating such a volatile state into a defensive alliance.

Then if NATO was consistent, it wouldn't allow Zelensky's one-party dictatorship that has cancelled elections, instituted comprehensive conscription programs that have cost tens of thousands of innocent people's deaths, banned 11+ opposition political parties, controls a total monopoly over the Ukrainian media, and is relentlessly persecuting the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, to join NATO. But in truth…  Read more they don't care about corruption, they just care about advancing their own interests. Let me be clear, this is not a fight between good guys and bad guys, this is a fight between bad guys and bad guys.