@ISIDEWITHQuestionsCriminal IssuesStarted 9yrs agoActive 2 days ago

Should police officers be required to wear body cameras?

In 2021 the U.S. Justice Department announced that federal agents would be required to wear body cameras when executing arrest warrants or searching buildings. A 2022 Bureau of Justice Statistics report found that 80% of local police departments in the US used body cameras. The study found that departments that used body cameras showed improvement in officer safety, increased evidence quality and reduced civilian complaints.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Congressional District 12

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 27.4k Congressional District 12 voters.

79%
Yes
21%
No
64%
Yes
17%
No
13%
Yes, this will protect the safety and rights of police officers and citizens
5%
No, it should be a police department’s or officer’s choice to wear one
2%
Yes, but only for patrol officers in high crime areas

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 27.4k Congressional District 12 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 27.4k Congressional District 12 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Congressional District 12 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8XLR4JX  from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, and there should be clear consequences for tampering with the device’s footage.

 @5LDXQRMfrom Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

Only In black towns/ neighborhoods

 @56WTPKPfrom Vermont  answered…4yrs4Y

No, police should be retrained to deescalate high-tension situations and react to dangerous suspects with less lethal force. The reason a criminal isn't afraid to shoot a cop is the same reason a soldier isn't afraid to shoot his opponent in battle. If you threaten another person with death, expect them to fight like hell to kill you first. Furthermore, police accused of abusing their power should be tried as if they never had a badge in the first place. Murder is murder regardless of who kills who.

 @8LXQB35 from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, the cameras never lie. That would help keep officers out of prison and help a lot with the investigations.

 @5J4LQMBfrom Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes!!! And if anyone fails to do what a man of the law says, like "stop, hands up, etc.", then the policeman has the lawful right to arrest you. If you try to shoot him, he can defend himself and shoot you. If you shoot a policeman, you should be arrested and the punishment should be you life's punishment, no exceptions, no parole.

 @5LDN8JLfrom Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but they should be able to be activated by dispatch officers, not the police officer.

 @9DQ5DR6 from Ohio  answered…1yr1Y

No. Police as an institution should be abolished.

 @57JJ5STfrom Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

Regardless, eliminate all tax-based police departments and allow the free market to provide police services

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Police Body Cameras” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Ohio officer charged with murder after fatally shooting pregnant woman

An Ohio police officer was charged with murder Tuesday for shooting and killing a pregnant woman during a confrontation in a grocery store parking lot last August.As Ta’Kiya Young sat in her car, Blendon Township police officer Connor Grubb and another officer approached her to accuse her of stealing from the store. In an interaction captured on body-camera footage, the officers ordered Young to exit her vehicle as she denied shoplifting. The car then began to move forward, and Grubb fired a shot that struck Young through her windshield, killing her and her unborn child.Grubb faces two counts of murder and felonious assault each for the deaths of Young, 21, and her fetus, along with two counts of involuntary manslaughter related to the death of the fetus. Felonious assault is sometimes called “felony murder.”On Aug. 24, an employee of a Kroger grocery store in Westerville, Ohio, told Grubb and the other officer, who has not been identified, that Young had stolen bottles of alcohol and then gotten into a car.Body-camera footage shows the other officer repeatedly asking Young to exit the vehicle as Grubb moves to stand in front of it. Young can be heard saying no and denying that she stole anything.Then Young turned the car’s steering wheel and the vehicle moved forward, the video shows. Grubb, who was standing in front of the car with his gun drawn, fired a shot into the windshield, striking Young.

▲  1215 replies

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3wks3W

Donald Trump nominates Pam Bondi as the next Attorney General

Former President and 2024 Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has announced his intention to nominate former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi as the next Attorney General of the United States, should he reclaim the presidency in the upcoming election.Bondi, a prominent figure in Republican politics, served as Florida's Attorney General from 2011 to 2019. She gained national attention for her legal battles on issues such as health care reform, consumer protection, and opioid abuse litigation. Known for her steadfast support of Trump during his presidency, Bondi also served as a key adviser during his first impeachment trial, where she defended his administration against accusations of abuse of power.In a statement released by his campaign, Trump praised Bondi’s “unwavering commitment to justice” and her “track record of standing up for everyday Americans against the abuses of Washington’s elites.”“Pam Bondi has been a fearless advocate for the people, and she embodies the principles of fairness, accountability, and the rule of law that are sorely needed to restore trust in our justice system,” Trump said. “She is the right person to lead the Department of Justice into a new era of integrity and excellence.”While Bondi’s nomination has been met with applause from conservative circles, it has also reignited criticism from Democrats and ethics watchdogs. Her acceptance of a $25,000 donation from the Trump Foundation in 2013, which coincided with her decision not to pursue an investigation into Trump University, has drawn scrutiny in the past and resurfaced following the announcement.Democratic leaders have already voiced opposition, questioning Bondi’s ability to lead the Department of Justice independently. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) called the nomination “a political power play” and urged a focus on “restoring integrity, not entrenching partisanship.”

▲  2317 replies

Active 3 days ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3wks3W

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1023 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3 days3D

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies