@ISIDEWITHQuestionsSocial IssuesStarted 9yrs agoActive 3hrs ago

Should “gender identity” be added to anti-discrimination laws?

Gender identity is defined as a personal conception of oneself as male, female, both, or neither. In 2014, President Obama signed an executive order barring discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity among federal contractors. The order covered employers who perform federal work and protected an estimated 20 percent of American workers. Opponents included religious groups, who argued that the order would prevent them from receiving federal money or contracts if they could not meet the new guidelines because of their beliefs. Proponents argue that the order was nece…  

Read more
+
Expand
+ Settings x  Austin Davis

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Expert Pundits

These active users have achieved advanced knowledge of the terminology, history, and legal implications regarding the topic of Gender Identity

@74YLG5W
#1 Expert Pundit
@Renaldo-Moon
#2 Expert Pundit

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of Gender Identity

@Detour-Ahead
#1 Informed Voter
@9YL5CYJ
#2 Informed Voter

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Gender Identity

@99G5GNZ
#1 Engaged Voter
Test Your Knowledge

Answer Overview

Response rates from 254 Austin Davis voters.

89%
Yes
11%
No
70%
Yes
9%
No
19%
Yes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination
2%
No, we should address gender identity as a mental health issue and provide funds for more research and care
0%
No, there are only two genders which are genetically not psychologically determined
0%
No, and repeal anti-discrimination laws for private companies

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 254 Austin Davis voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 254 Austin Davis voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Austin Davis voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8MN8DQ9 from Louisiana  answered…4yrs4Y

I feel we should not add it to the law, but still help anyone with gender identity so that they are comfortable.

 @8NCRRZL from Nebraska  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes and no. While switching genders is perfectly fine and possible (especially with today's technology), creating/making up new genders is somewhat absurd.

 @8LYRM7H from Maine  answered…4yrs4Y

2 genders done

 @4X879L5from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

No, gender identity is not real and transexualism is a disease

 @4Q7XPWFfrom California  answered…4yrs4Y

yes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination. saying that someone's gender identity or sexuality is against your religious beliefs is ridiculous. It does not force you to be aother gender who love your own sex. people are just homophobic and do not want people to be who they want to be.

 @8N5LRBG from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

our life our choice

 @carsonshaw25from Oklahoma  answered…4yrs4Y

If you have a man's urinary system use the men's room. If you have a female's urinary system use the woman's room. Shouldn't matter about the "identification".

 @4XC4KJBfrom Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

Gender and sex are not the same thing. This issue is not well enough understood for government to act on it. Gender is psychological, sex is biological, gender shouldn't be treated like sex and sex shouldn't be treated like gender.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Gender Identity” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2mos2MO

Kentucky Democratic governor bans conversion therapy

Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear (D) on Wednesday signed an executive order banning “conversion therapy” for minors — skirting the Republican-led state legislature and setting up a likely legal challenge.Beshear said the new policy, which goes into effect immediately, is an overdue step to protect children from a widely discredited medical practice that attempts to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity.“Kentucky cannot possibly reach its full potential unless it is free from discrimination by or against any citizen — unless all our people feel welcome in our spaces, free from unjust barriers and supported to be themselves,” said Beshear, who is one of two Democratic governors in the South.Major professional medical organizations — including the American Medical Association and the American Psychiatric Association — have denounced conversion therapy as harmful and ineffective, citing research that shows the controversial treatment leads to increased risk of suicide and depression.Previous attempts to ban conversion therapy in Kentucky have stalled or failed in the state legislature. Opponents have argued that prohibiting the practice tramples parental rights and infringes on freedom of speech. On Wednesday, a slew of legislators and conservative groups took aim at Beshear’s use of his executive powers to override Kentucky’s legislative branch — and some vowed to challenge the ban in court.

▲  167 replies

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.