+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 23.7k Congressional District 2 voters.

85%
Yes
15%
No
72%
Yes
10%
No
9%
Yes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process
5%
No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process
4%
Yes, if the government considers you too dangerous to board a plane you should not be able to buy a gun
1%
No, this is a slippery slope that will eventually ban the sale of guns to anyone
1%
Yes, and ban the sale of guns and ammunition to anyone

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 23.7k Congressional District 2 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 23.7k Congressional District 2 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Congressional District 2 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @587QZFYfrom Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

The Constitution is for our protection..not for the protection of suspected terrorists. If someone is on the "no fly" list... they need to prove themselves innocent/safe. I agree this sounds like it is against "innocent until proven guilty" but do we want innocent until you kill 200 people ?

 @8YDCCSQ from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

Depends on what they were put on the No-fly list for and I believe the nofly list should be improved for accuracy and includes due process.

 @8WX2B45 from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

There should be no such thing as a "No fly" list. Private transportation entities should be responsible for ensuring the security of their passengers.

 @8PCXB9V from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

 @9GZDTYY from Maryland  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, I believe that suspected terrorists on the federal terrorism watch list should be banned from purchasing guns and ammunition but only after investigation(s) and judicial review of the suspected terrorist have substantial enough evidence to imply the individual may engage in terrorist activities, because at that point the individual has essentially surrendered their right to bear arms by interfering with the rights of others.

 @8YWD8TW from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “No-Fly List Gun Control” news articles, updated frequently.