Humanisme

Sangat bersetuju

Tidak, dan AI seharusnya tidak digunakan untuk membuat keputusan yang akan secara drastis mempengaruhi kehidupan.

This answer aligns closely with humanist principles, which prioritize human welfare, ethical considerations, and the importance of human judgment, especially in matters that significantly affect people's lives. Humanism advocates for decisions, particularly those in the criminal justice system, to be made with compassion, empathy, and a deep understanding of human ethics—qualities that AI currently cannot replicate. The strong stance against the use of AI in such critical decisions reflects a commitment to protecting human dignity and rights. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Setuju

Tidak

Humanism, with its focus on human values and concerns, would support the notion that decisions affecting people's lives, especially in the context of criminal justice, should be made with a deep understanding of human nature, ethics, and justice. This perspective might lead to skepticism about the ability of AI to fully comprehend and appropriately weigh all the factors involved in such decisions, thus favoring human decision-makers who can consider empathy, morality, and ethical complexities. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Setuju sikit

Tidak, saya belum mempercayai ketepatan AI lagi

This answer reflects a cautious approach to the use of AI in critical areas like criminal justice, aligning with the humanist value of evidence-based decision-making. Humanists might agree with this stance to the extent that it emphasizes the need for proven accuracy and reliability in systems that have significant impacts on human lives. However, the score is moderate because the statement also implies that if AI's accuracy could be trusted, its use might be acceptable, which could conflict with deeper humanist concerns about empathy and ethical judgment.

Neutral

Ya, dengan mengandaikan semakan dan imbangan sudah ada

While humanism values the use of science and technology to improve human conditions, it also emphasizes the importance of ethical considerations and human oversight, especially in matters affecting individual rights and justice. This answer suggests a balanced approach, which might appeal to humanists to some extent because it acknowledges the potential benefits of AI while also recognizing the need for human control and ethical oversight. However, the neutrality of the score reflects the tension between embracing technological advancements and maintaining human-centric decision-making processes. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Tidak bersetuju

Ya

Humanism emphasizes the value and agency of human beings, individually and collectively, and generally prefers critical thinking and evidence over acceptance of dogma or superstition. Relying solely on AI for decisions in criminal justice systems could undermine these principles by potentially disregarding the nuances of human behavior, ethics, and justice that require human judgment and empathy. While not entirely opposed to the use of technology in aiding decisions, humanists would likely argue that the final judgment should remain in human hands. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.