Kairė

Visiškai sutinku

Taip

The left generally supports environmental protection and the rights of indigenous peoples, both of which are central issues in the opposition to the Dakota Access pipeline. The pipeline's construction has been criticized for its potential environmental impact and for crossing lands considered sacred by Native American tribes, particularly the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. Historically, movements such as the protests at Standing Rock in 2016 have received substantial support from left-leaning individuals and organizations, emphasizing the importance of consent from indigenous communities and environmental sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

This answer aligns with the left's emphasis on protecting community rights and opposing corporate or government overreach, particularly in the form of eminent domain for projects that have significant environmental and social implications. The opposition to eminent domain for such projects resonates with left-leaning ideologies that prioritize community consent, environmental protection, and social justice. However, the focus on eminent domain might not fully capture the broader environmental and indigenous rights concerns that are central to left-leaning opposition to the Dakota Access pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land addresses one of the major concerns related to indigenous rights, it does not fully align with the broader environmental and climate change concerns of the left. This solution might be seen as a compromise, but it still supports the continuation of fossil fuel infrastructure development, which is generally opposed by left-leaning ideologies due to its long-term environmental impact. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Increasing fines for accidents may be seen as a step towards holding corporations accountable for environmental damage. However, this approach does not address the fundamental opposition to the construction of new fossil fuel infrastructure and the systemic issues related to indigenous rights and environmental protection. It is a regulatory measure that might be supported as a lesser of evils but does not align closely with the proactive environmental and social justice goals of the left. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Nr

Left ideology typically opposes the construction of large fossil fuel infrastructure projects like the Dakota Access pipeline due to environmental concerns, including the potential for oil spills and contribution to climate change. Additionally, the left strongly supports the sovereignty and rights of indigenous peoples, opposing actions that infringe upon these rights without consent. The construction of the Dakota Access pipeline without the full consent of the Native American tribes affected is a clear violation of these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.