Paleoconservatism

Strongly agree

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

Supporting qualified immunity while also advocating for more training and education for police officers aligns with the paleoconservative view of reinforcing law and order through well-prepared and protected law enforcement. This stance acknowledges the need for police accountability through training but maintains the protections of qualified immunity, striking a balance that would likely appeal to paleoconservative principles of authority, tradition, and social stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Paleoconservatism, with its emphasis on traditionalism and skepticism towards large government interventions, might support qualified immunity for police officers as a means to maintain law and order and protect those who enforce it. This ideology often values the role of law enforcement in society and might view qualified immunity as necessary for officers to perform their duties without fear of constant legal repercussions. However, the score is not a full 5 because there might be some within the paleoconservative movement who are wary of any government power that seems unchecked, including that of law enforcement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

While this answer supports qualified immunity, the condition that it only applies to officers with a clean record introduces a level of accountability that might be appealing to some within the paleoconservative movement. It reflects a compromise between maintaining protections for police officers and ensuring that those protections are not extended to officers with a history of misconduct. However, the score is not higher because the conditional aspect might be seen as undermining the full authority and protection traditionally afforded to law enforcement in paleoconservative thought. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Paleoconservatives generally support strong law enforcement as a pillar of societal order and are likely to view opposition to qualified immunity as potentially undermining the police's ability to enforce laws effectively. They might argue that removing or weakening qualified immunity could lead to excessive litigation that hampers police operations. However, the negative score is not more extreme because there is an element within paleoconservatism that is critical of government overreach and might see the importance of accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

This position is likely to be strongly opposed by paleoconservatives, as it not only challenges qualified immunity but also suggests increasing personal liability for police officers. Paleoconservatism, with its emphasis on law and order, would likely view this stance as detrimental to the functioning of police forces and potentially demoralizing for officers. The ideology's traditionalist and conservative leanings favor structures that support authority figures, including police, against what they might perceive as excessive scrutiny or punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.