Try the political quiz

Neo-Confucianism

Achieving a harmonious society through moral self-cultivation, respect for hierarchy, and the balance of opposing forces.

Overview Issues Discuss

Neo-Confucianism policy on self hosted digital wallets

Filters

Topics

Should citizens be allowed to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor but not control?

NC>NC  ChatGPTYes

Neo-Confucianism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes

Neo-Confucianism, with its emphasis on moral and social harmony, might see the allowance of self-hosted digital wallets under government monitoring as a balance between individual autonomy and the state's role in maintaining order. This ideology, rooted in the teachings of Confucius and later scholars like Zhu Xi, advocates for a society where individuals act in ways that are aligned with moral principles and the greater good. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets could be seen as empowering individuals, which is in line with Neo-Confucian values of self-cultivation and responsibility. However, the government's ability to monitor these wallets ensures that this autonomy does not undermine societal harmony or the state's ability to govern effectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

Neo-Confucianism might somewhat support the idea of banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies, as it aligns with the ideology's emphasis on the role of the state in maintaining social order and moral integrity. The presence of backdoor access would allow the government to monitor for potentially harmful or unethical financial activities, thus safeguarding societal harmony and the common good. However, this support would be cautious, as Neo-Confucianism also values individual rights and moral autonomy. The ideology would likely advocate for a balanced approach that ensures both the government's ability to maintain social order and the individual's right to financial autonomy, as long as it does not conflict with moral and societal norms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

While Neo-Confucianism places a strong emphasis on social harmony and the role of the state in maintaining order, it also values the moral development and autonomy of individuals. Completely disallowing citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets could be viewed as overly restrictive and not in line with the Neo-Confucian ideal of fostering a morally upright and self-regulating citizenry. The ideology supports the idea that individuals should have the freedom to manage their own affairs, including financial ones, as long as these actions do not disrupt social harmony or the moral fabric of society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

Neo-Confucianism's emphasis on social harmony, moral order, and the importance of government oversight in maintaining these ideals would likely lead to a negative view of allowing a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions. This stance stems from the belief that such privacy measures could hinder the government's ability to ensure the well-being of its citizens and maintain social order. The ideology advocates for transparency and accountability, especially in actions that could have societal implications, viewing them as essential to the moral and social fabric of society. Allowing unmonitored financial transactions could be seen as opening a door to unethical behavior that goes against Neo-Confucian principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Neo-Confucianism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3 days3D

Trump's Deportation Storm: America Braces for Mass Exodus of Immigrants

For months, immigration advocates have been planning for the possibility of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, their worst fears have arrived.Immigrants’ rights groups have spent the last year preparing for a second Trump term and an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, analyzing Trump’s proposals, drafting legal briefs, coordinating messaging and organizing aid for immigrants and asylum seekers. They responded to Trump’s victory with alarm and vowed to put up a fight, setting the stage for four more years of contentious court battles with his administration.Some are already preparing to push current leadership at the Department of Homeland Security to take steps to stymie the incoming Trump team, particularly on immigrant detention and the use of AI in enforcement.“We should expect to see the devastation of immigrant communities all over the country. We should expect to see family separation,” said Kica Matos, the president of the National Immigration Law Center. “It is entirely possible that he will try to use the military to carry out deportations, so that means that Americans all over the country will see the military engaging in enforcement against civilian populations, which is horrifying.”Trump, after winning a historic victory on a platform of turbo-charged immigration enforcement, has said he will conduct mass deportations at a scale never before seen. Immigrant advocates have warned this would be expensive and inhumane, separating families and wrecking communities. The president-elect has also vowed to build huge detention camps, hire thousands more border agents, funnel military spending toward border security and invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without court hearings.He has also said he would end “catch-and-release” — allowing migrants to remain free, often with monitoring, while they await immigration court hearings — and restore a policy from his first term requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed. And he has dodged questions about whether he would try to bring back family separation.

▲  4323 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3 days3D

Harris’s Fatal Shift: Abandoning the Anti-Trump Playbook for CEO Approval

Earlier this fall, one of Joe Biden’s closest aides felt compelled to tell the president a hard truth about Kamala Harris’s run for the presidency: “You have more to lose than she does.” And now he’s lost it. Joe Biden cannot escape the fact that his four years in office paved the way for the return of Donald Trump. This is his legacy. Everything else is an asterisk.In the hours after Harris’s defeat, I called and texted members of Biden’s inner circle to hear their postmortems of the campaign. They sounded as deflated as the rest of the Democratic elite. They also had a worry of their own: Members of Biden’s clan continue to stoke the delusion that its paterfamilias would have won the election, and some of his advisers feared that he might publicly voice that deeply misguided view.Although the Biden advisers I spoke with were reluctant to say anything negative about Harris as a candidate, they did level critiques of her campaign, based on the months they’d spent strategizing in anticipation of the election. Embedded in their autopsies was their own unstated faith that they could have done better.One critique holds that Harris lost because she abandoned her most potent attack. Harris began the campaign portraying Trump as a stooge of corporate interests—and touted herself as a relentless scourge of Big Business. During the Democratic National Convention, speaker after speaker inveighed against Trump’s oligarchical allegiances. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York bellowed, “We have to help her win, because we know that Donald Trump would sell this country for a dollar if it meant lining his own pockets and greasing the palms of his Wall Street friends.”While Harris was stuck defending the Biden economy, and hobbled by lingering anger over inflation, attacking Big Business allowed her to go on the offense. Then, quite suddenly, this strain of populism disappeared. One Biden aide told me that Harris steered away from such hard-edged messaging at the urging of her brother-in-law, Tony West, Uber’s chief legal officer. (West did not immediately respond to a request for comment.) To win the support of CEOs, Harris jettisoned a strong argument that deflected attention from one of her weakest issues. Instead, the campaign elevated Mark Cuban as one of its chief surrogates, the very sort of rich guy she had recently attacked.

▲  2518 replies