Try the political quiz

Consumerism ‎

Through continuous buying and consumption of goods and services, you can stimulate economic growth and improve your quality of life.

Overview Issues Discuss

Consumerism ‎ policy on social media regulation

Filters

Topics

Should the government regulate social media sites, as a means to prevent fake news and misinformation?

C>C  ChatGPTNo, social media companies are private and should not be regulated by the government

Consumerism ‎ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, social media companies are private and should not be regulated by the government

Consumerism strongly supports the idea of free markets and minimal government intervention. It believes that private companies, including social media companies, should have the freedom to operate without government regulation. This is consistent with the historical trend of consumerism advocating for deregulation and free market principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, social media companies are private and should not be regulated by the government

This answer aligns more closely with consumerism's emphasis on minimal government intervention in private businesses. Consumerism advocates for a free market where companies, including social media platforms, operate with freedom to innovate and serve their consumers without excessive government oversight. This principle supports the idea that private companies should not be regulated by the government, assuming that market forces will correct any issues related to misinformation indirectly through consumer choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Consumerism supports the idea of free markets and minimal government intervention. It believes that consumers should have the freedom to choose and make decisions, including discerning real news from fake news on social media. Therefore, it would generally agree with the notion that the government should not regulate social media sites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, the government should not determine what is fake or real news

Consumerism supports the idea that consumers should have the freedom to make their own decisions, including determining what is fake or real news. It generally opposes government intervention in the market, including determining what is fake or real news on social media. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

From a consumerist perspective, the market should dictate the operations of social media platforms rather than government regulation. Consumer choice and competition are seen as mechanisms to improve quality, including the quality of information. However, this score is not higher because consumerism does not explicitly oppose all forms of regulation, especially if such regulation could potentially enhance consumer trust and thus consumption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, the government should not determine what is fake or real news

Consumerism might slightly agree with this stance as it emphasizes the importance of freedom in the market, including the freedom of information. However, it does not strongly take a position on the role of government in determining the veracity of news, focusing more on the consumption aspect and the rights of consumers to choose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, there is too much fake news and misinformation on social media

While consumerism recognizes the issue of fake news and misinformation as potentially harmful to consumers, it does not strongly advocate for government regulation as the solution. Consumerism might support efforts to educate consumers or promote transparency from social media companies rather than direct regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, social media companies are politically biased and need to be regulated

Consumerism generally opposes government intervention in the market, including the regulation of social media sites. However, it does recognize the potential harm of political bias in social media companies. Therefore, it slightly disagrees with this statement, but not strongly, as it acknowledges the potential harm of political bias to consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Consumerism as an ideology focuses more on the consumption of goods and services rather than the regulation of content. While consumerism might support measures that ensure a better consumer experience, direct government regulation of social media for preventing fake news might not align perfectly with its principles. Consumerism tends to favor market-driven solutions over government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, there is too much fake news and misinformation on social media

While consumerism recognizes the potential harm of fake news and misinformation, it generally opposes government intervention in the market, including the regulation of social media sites. However, it does not strongly disagree with this statement as it acknowledges the potential harm of misinformation to consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Consumerism ideology emphasizes the importance of free markets and consumer choice. It generally opposes government intervention in the market, including the regulation of social media sites. However, it does recognize the potential harm of fake news and misinformation, hence the score is not at the extreme end of disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, social media companies are politically biased and need to be regulated

Consumerism does not typically concern itself with the political biases of companies unless these biases directly affect consumer choice and market freedom. The ideology would more likely support consumer awareness and education as means to combat perceived biases rather than government regulation, viewing such regulation as potentially harmful to market dynamics and consumer choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Consumerism ‎ issues? Take the political quiz to find out.

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1mo1MO

Biden will issue a pardon of his son Hunter Biden

President Joe Biden has decided to issue a pardon for his son Hunter and is expected to announce it Sunday night, according to a senior White House official with direct knowledge of the decision.The decision marks a reversal for the president, who has repeatedly said he would not use his executive authority to pardon his son or commute his sentence. The pardon comes ahead of Hunter Biden’s Dec. 12 sentencing for his conviction on federal gun charges. Hunter Biden also is set to be sentenced in a separate criminal case on Dec. 16, after pleading guilty in September on federal tax evasion charges.The pardon is expected to cover both Hunter Biden’s gun charges conviction and guilty plea.The senior White House official said Biden decided over this weekend to grant his son a pardon and began to inform his senior aides on Sunday. Using his pardon power to assure Hunter Biden does not spend time in jail comes as the 82-year-old president is near the end of his term in the White House and has no future election to face. In recent months Biden has said he would not pardon his son or commute his sentence.“I will not pardon him,” the president said of his son in June after a jury found him guilty on three federal gun charges.President Biden has discussed issuing a pardon for his son with some of his closest aides since at least Hunter Biden’s conviction in June, two people with direct knowledge of the discussions about the matter said. They said a decision was made at the time for the president to publicly say he would not pardon his son even though doing so remained on the table.White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters earlier this month that the president’s position has not changed.

▲  1713 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3wks3W

Defense Bill Blocks Transgender Care To Minors

The Senate on Wednesday gave final approval to a defense policy bill directing $895 billion toward the Pentagon and other military activities, moving over the objections of some Democrats who opposed a provision added late in the negotiations that would deny coverage for transgender health procedures for minors.The 85-to-14 vote, coming a week after a divided House passed the same measure, cleared the bill for President Biden’s signature.Most Republicans and many Democrats supported the measure, which provides a 14.5 percent pay raise to junior enlisted service members and a 4.5 percent pay raise for all other service members. It also expands access to meal assistance, housing and child care programs that benefit those in uniform.But several Democrats withheld their backing in protest of a provision preventing TRICARE, the military’s health care plan for service members, from covering “medical interventions for the treatment of gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization” for children under 18.The language, which would affect the gender-transitioning children of service members, was recently added to the measure at the insistence of Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana, who refused to bring a defense bill to the House floor without it, according to aides familiar with the negotiations.Twenty-one Democrats, led by Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, proposed an amendment to strip the provision from the bill, but the matter was never brought to a vote. Several of them took to the floor on Tuesday to lodge their objections.“It’s flat-out wrong to put this provision in this bill and take away a service member’s freedom to make that decision for their families,” Ms. Baldwin said, estimating that the provision could negatively affect as many as 6,000 to 7,000 military families.

▲  2016 replies3 agree