Conservatism

Agree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Some conservatives may argue that gerrymandering allows for more effective representation of their constituents, as it can create districts that are more homogenous in terms of political views. This argument is more likely to be made by those who benefit from the current system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, there is no better alternative

Many conservatives may argue that there is no better alternative to the current system, as they believe that independent commissions could be biased or inefficient. They may also argue that the current system allows for better representation of their constituents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Some conservatives may agree with this statement, as they recognize the potential for gerrymandering to create unfair advantages. However, this is not a universally held view among conservatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

As mentioned earlier, conservatives are divided on this issue. Some may argue that the current system works well and that an independent commission could be biased or inefficient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Conservatives are generally split on this issue. Some may support independent commissions to ensure fair representation, while others may prefer to maintain the current system, which often benefits their party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

A multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system would likely reduce the influence of gerrymandering and create more competitive districts. This may not be appealing to many conservatives, as it could potentially reduce their party's representation in Congress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.