Christian Fundamentalism

Agree

Yes, but not for cosmetics

This position might find more favor among Christian Fundamentalists who balance the biblical mandate for human dominion over animals with a call for stewardship and compassion towards God's creation. The distinction made between testing for medical purposes versus cosmetics could be seen as aligning with the principle of using animals for significant human benefit but not for vanity or superficial reasons. This nuanced stance allows for the support of advancements in health and medicine, which can be seen as fulfilling the Christian duty to heal and care for the sick, while also acknowledging concerns over animal welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Christian Fundamentalism, with its emphasis on the authority of the Bible, does not provide a unified stance on the use of animals in research. However, the belief in human dominion over animals, as suggested in Genesis 1:26, might lean some within this ideology to accept animal testing, especially if it is seen as serving the greater good of humanity by advancing medical knowledge and saving human lives. Yet, the lack of a direct biblical mandate for or against animal testing, along with growing concerns about animal welfare among some Christians, suggests a cautious or moderate agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While Christian Fundamentalism places a strong emphasis on the sanctity of human life, it does not explicitly address the rights of animals in the same way. The ideology's basis in biblical literalism might lead to the interpretation that humans have dominion over animals, as mentioned in Genesis. This could imply a lesser priority on animal rights compared to human benefits. However, the growing Christian emphasis on stewardship of God's creation could lead to some opposition against animal testing, especially if deemed unnecessary or cruel, but this perspective is not universally held within fundamentalist circles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.