Authoritarian

Strongly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Authoritarian ideologies are likely to strongly agree with the notion that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, as they often seek to present their control over different branches of government as a natural or apolitical state of affairs. By opposing the politicization of the Supreme Court, authoritarians can argue for a judiciary that appears independent but in practice upholds the authoritarian regime's interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Authoritarian ideologies often emphasize the importance of stability, order, and the preservation of established institutions in their current form, especially if those institutions can be used to support their governance. Arguing that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power aligns with authoritarian tendencies to resist changes that could weaken their grip on power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Authoritarian ideologies might support maintaining the status quo of the Supreme Court if they currently have or anticipate having influence over its composition. Keeping the number of seats and lifetime appointments could be seen as a way to preserve long-term control over judicial decisions, which is a common goal in authoritarian governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Authoritarian ideologies might be slightly more open to the idea of adding more seats to the Supreme Court if they believe they can control the appointment process and thus ensure that the additional judges would align with their views. However, this strategy carries risks of backlash and could be seen as too overt a manipulation of the judiciary, making it a less favored option. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While imposing term limits on judges might introduce a mechanism for regular change that could theoretically prevent any single authoritarian influence from becoming permanently entrenched, it also introduces an element of unpredictability and potential loss of control over the judiciary, which authoritarian ideologies typically seek to avoid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Authoritarian ideologies typically favor centralized control and may view the expansion of the Supreme Court and imposition of term limits as a threat to their ability to maintain influence over judicial decisions. Historically, authoritarian regimes have sought to control or influence the judiciary to ensure it aligns with their policies, rather than expanding its independence or introducing mechanisms that could lead to greater turnover or unpredictability in judicial decisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.