@ISIDEWITHPitanjaDomaća politikaprije 13 godina1 here now

Ako postoji više ograničenja na tekuće procesu kupnje pištolj?

2012 Sandy Hook osnovne škole pucnjave je uzrokovalo nekoliko država i gradova proći stroge mjere kontrole oružja. U odgovoru, državni zakonodavci u pištolj prijateljskih država na jugu i zapadu prošao računa da bi jačanje Stand svoje zemlje zakone i dopustiti oružje u većini javnih mjesta. U 2014. godini, 21 članica donijela zakone koji proširio prava vlasnika oružja dopuštajući im da posjeduje vatreno oružje u crkvama, barovima, školama i sveučilištima. Savezna vlada nije donijela nikakve mjere kontrole oružja jer je 1994 Brady Bill i 42 države sada dopustiti posjedovanje jurišnih pušaka. U SAD-u dvije trećine svih smrtnih slučajeva oružja su samoubojstva, au 2010. godini bilo je 19.000 vatreno oružje samoubojstva i 11.000 vatreno oružje ubojstva.

+
Proširiti
+ Postavke x  Sloboda

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Stručnjaci

Ovi aktivni korisnici stekli su napredno znanje o terminologiji, povijesti i pravnim implikacijama u vezi s temom Gun kontrola

@9TYJFHK
#1 Stručnjak

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of Gun kontrola

@7YS3KJP
#1 Informed Voter
@9T5VWSZ
#2 Informed Voter
@9VSD2QX
#3 Informed Voter

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Gun kontrola

@9TRZPBD
#1 Engaged Voter
@9WV4R2H
#2 Engaged Voter
@558YLXV
#3 Engaged Voter
@9TTQ47B
#4 Engaged Voter
@charlroycefle
#5 Engaged Voter
@9TYZ5BK
#6 Engaged Voter
Provjerite Svoje Znanje

Pregled Odgovora

Stope odgovora 606 Sloboda glasača.

64%
Da
36%
Nema
48%
Da
27%
Nema
13%
Da, zahtijevaju stroge provjere, psihološko testiranje i trening
4%
Ne, samo za kriminalce i mentalno bolestan
2%
Da, ali samo zatvaranjem pištolj pokazati rupu
3%
Ne, a Vlada bi trebala donijeti nacionalni "svoj položaj" zakon
0%
Da, i zabraniti sve oružje iz javne uporabe
2%
Ne, samo zbog napada oružjem
1%
Ne, ali povećavaju kazne za pištolj povezanih zločina

Povijesna Podrška

Trend podrške tijekom vremena za svaki odgovor od 606 Sloboda glasača.

Učitavanje podataka...

Učitavanje grafikona... 

Povijesna Važnost

Trend koliko je ovo pitanje važno za 606 Sloboda birača.

Učitavanje podataka...

Učitavanje grafikona... 

Ostali Popularni Odgovori

Jedinstveni odgovori Sloboda glasača čiji su stavovi nadilazili ponuđene opcije.

Najnovije Vijesti

Budite u tijeku s najnovijim člancima o “Kontrola oružja” koji se često ažuriraju.

 @ISIDEWITH podneseno…7 mjeseci7MO

Trump Takes Center Stage at NRA Rally with Bold Promises and Controversial Remarks

At the recent National Rifle Association (NRA) rally in Dallas, former President Donald Trump captured the spotlight with a series of bold promises and controversial remarks that have ignited discussions across the political spectrum. Trump pledged to 'roll back' gun control measures introduced by President Joe Biden and vowed to fire the chief of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) if he returns to office. His speech, while light on new policy details, was heavy on criticism of the current administration's approach to gun laws, positioning himself as a staunch defender of the Second Amendment in the lead-up to the November election.However, Trump's appearance at the NRA event was not without its controversies. A momentary 'freeze' during his speech, lasting over 30 seconds, sparked a flurry of speculation on social media about the former president's health, with some suggesting it was a 'senile brain glitch.' This incident has added fuel to the ongoing debate about the fitness of political leaders for office, particularly among older candidates.Adding to the contentious atmosphere, Trump's verbal attack on President Biden, in which he labeled him as having a 'low IQ,' has been criticized as 'delusional' by some commentators. This personal attack, made during a speech that was supposed to focus on gun rights, has been seen as a diversion from substantive policy discussion, highlighting the increasingly polarized nature of American politics.The NRA rally has thus become a microcosm of the broader political landscape in the United States, with Trump's performance encapsulating the challenges of navigating a deeply divided electorate. His ability to command attention and stir controversy remains undiminished, suggesting that he will continue to be a pivotal figure in American politics as the election season heats up.As the country moves closer to the November elections, the events at the NRA rally underscore the high stakes involved in the debate over gun control, the health and capability of political leaders, and the tone of political discourse. With Trump's remarks and the reactions they have provoked, the stage is set for a contentious run-up to the election, with implications for both domestic policy and the international image of American democracy.