@ISIDEWITHPitanjaDomaća politikaprije 9 godina1 here now

Ukoliko žrtve nasilja pištolj moći tužiti vatrenog oružja dilera i proizvođača?

U 2005, Kongres donio zaštite zakonitih trgovine u Zakona o oružju (PLCAA). Zakon štiti pištolj proizvođača i trgovaca od toga da bude odgovoran ako zločini su počinjeni sa svojim proizvodima. Zakon je donesen kao odgovor na niz tužbi podnesenih protiv pištoljem industrije u kasnim 1990-ih koji je tvrdio pištolj odluka i prodavači ne rade dovoljno kako bi spriječio zločine počinjene s njihovim proizvodima. Zagovornici zakona tvrde da će tužbe obeshrabriti proizvođači pištolj iz opskrbu trgovina koji prodaju oružje koje završavaju se koristi u nasilne zločine. Protivnici tvrde da proizvođači oružja nisu odgovorni za slučajnih djela nasilja s njihovim proizvodima.

+
Proširiti
+ Postavke x  Brian Kemp

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of pištolj odgovornosti

@9VZHHFP
#1 Engaged Voter
Provjerite Svoje Znanje

Pregled Odgovora

Stope odgovora 2.6k Brian Kemp glasača.

13%
Da
87%
Nema
10%
Da
77%
Nema
1%
Da, dok je gubitak strana plati sve pravne pristojbe, to je naš ustavno pravo tužiti bilo koga iz bilo kojeg razloga
10%
Ne, proizvođači i trgovci bi trebao biti održan samo odgovoran za nemar
1%
Da, bilo koji posao treba biti odgovoran ako je primarna uporaba svog proizvoda za nezakonite aktivnosti
1%
Da, ali samo trgovci

Povijesna Podrška

Trend podrške tijekom vremena za svaki odgovor od 2.6k Brian Kemp glasača.

Učitavanje podataka...

Učitavanje grafikona... 

Povijesna Važnost

Trend koliko je ovo pitanje važno za 2.6k Brian Kemp birača.

Učitavanje podataka...

Učitavanje grafikona... 

Ostali Popularni Odgovori

Jedinstveni odgovori Brian Kemp glasača čiji su stavovi nadilazili ponuđene opcije.

Najnovije Vijesti

Budite u tijeku s najnovijim člancima o “Odgovornost za oružje” koji se često ažuriraju.

 @ISIDEWITH podneseno…2 dana2D

Police "Didn't Return Fire" In Sweden Mass Shooting

It was about 12:30 p.m. on a gray Tuesday in Orebro, Sweden, when gunfire erupted at an adult education center, with students and teachers in class. Minutes later, as an alarm wailed, the police charged into the center, Campus Risbergska, where they encountered a chaotic, smoke-filled scene. It would be hours before they gave an all-clear.“An inferno. Dead people. Injured people. Screams and smoke,” Lars Wiren, Orebro’s police chief, said Thursday at a news conference as he described the scene.When officers entered the school on Tuesday, it was filled with smoke from pyrotechnics, Mr. Wiren said. The police came under a hail of gunfire so intense that officers could not tell how many shooters were on the scene, he added. Through the smoke, officers saw a man approaching them and carrying what appeared to be a rifle.The man continued to shoot, emptying several magazines of ammunition. In the chaos, none of the 130 police officers chose to return fire, the police chief said.“You have to respect the situation. There’s panic among the students, the teachers,” Mr. Wiren said. “There’s smoke. The circumstances must be right in order to fire.”After about an hour, officers later found the gunman among the dead. Near his body were three weapons, including the rifle. Scattered nearby were at least 10 empty magazines and unused ammunition, Mr. Wiren said.Police officers fanned out across the four-acre campus, searching for victims and possibly more perpetrators in an operation that lasted over three hours, according to a police timeline of events.In one of the classrooms, Hellen Werme and other students hid for at least two hours under tables and hospital beds used for training. As soon as shots rang out, they locked the door and hid on the far side of the room, she said. At one point, they heard the gunman pass by.“We were very quiet. He was close,” Ms. Werme, 35, recalled a day later. “I could hear his steps, but then the shots were further and further away.”