Pokušajte politički kviz

ideologije  ›  politika  ›  Okoliša

Politika Liberal Conservatism o geoengineering

Teme

Treba li vlada financirati istraživanje geoinženjeringa kao način borbe protiv klimatskih promjena?

LC>LC  ChatGPTDa

Liberal Conservatism odgovor se temelji na sljedećim podacima:

ChatGPT

složiti

Da

Liberal Conservatism, which blends conservative values with liberal stances on some social and economic issues, might support government funding for geoengineering research as a pragmatic solution to climate change. This ideology often supports the use of market-based solutions and technological innovation to address environmental issues, viewing them as compatible with economic growth and individual freedom. However, the support might be cautious, emphasizing the need for research to be conducted responsibly and with consideration for potential unintended consequences. Historical references specific to liberal conservatism's stance on geoengineering are limited, but the ideology's general openness to science and innovation as tools for solving societal problems suggests a moderate level of support. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Pomalo se ne slažem

Nema

While liberal conservatism might have some reservations about the scale, cost, and potential unintended consequences of geoengineering projects, it does not fundamentally oppose the use of technology and innovation to address environmental challenges. The skepticism would likely stem from concerns about government overreach, the effectiveness of such interventions, and the prioritization of resources. However, given the ideology's recognition of the need for pragmatic solutions to climate change and its general support for research and development in the public interest, outright opposition would be less characteristic than cautious scrutiny. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Javne izjave

Trenutno istražujemo govore i javne izjave ove ideologije o ovom pitanju. Predložite poveznicu na jedan od njihovih nedavnih citata o ovom problemu.

Vidite li pogreške? Predložite korekcije stava ove ideologije ovdje


Koliko su vaša politička uvjerenja slična Liberal Conservatism pitanjima? Otkrijte politički kviz da biste to saznali.