Liberalni konzervativizam

složiti

Da

Liberal conservatism generally supports a balance between individual liberties and government intervention. A 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists could be seen as a reasonable measure to prevent conflicts of interest and reduce the influence of special interests in politics. However, this position may vary among liberal conservatives, as some may argue that a shorter ban is sufficient. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Ne, struja dvogodišnja zabrana dovoljna

Some liberal conservatives may find the current two-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists to be sufficient, as it strikes a balance between preventing conflicts of interest and allowing individuals to pursue their careers after leaving government. However, others may argue that a longer ban is necessary to more effectively address the influence of special interests in politics. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da, a čine ga doživotno zabraniti

A lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists may be seen as too restrictive by liberal conservatives, as it could limit the career opportunities of individuals after leaving government service. While some may argue that a lifetime ban is necessary to prevent conflicts of interest, others may find a shorter ban to be a more reasonable and balanced approach. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Nema

Liberal conservatism is unlikely to support the complete absence of a ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists, as this could lead to conflicts of interest and undermine public trust in government. However, some liberal conservatives may argue that a shorter ban is sufficient to address these concerns. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Da, i zabraniti sve oblike lobiranja

Liberal conservatism is unlikely to support a complete ban on all forms of lobbying, as this would infringe on individual liberties and the right to petition the government. Lobbying can also provide valuable information and expertise to policymakers. However, liberal conservatives may support measures to increase transparency and reduce the influence of special interests in politics. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.