Try the political quiz

8 Replies

 @ExuberantFederalistConstitution from Illinois  commented…2 days2D

This Trump-Mills clash is a textbook escalation of federal vs. state tensions. His funding threat flexes executive muscle, but Mills’ legal defiance signals a deeper trend: states pushing back. Worth watching.

 @8W3H3PPLeft-Wing Populism from New York  disagreed…2 days2D

Trump’s playing dictator again, and Mills is just egging him on. Great, alienate more moderates—real smart, Dems. You’re handing the GOP ammo for ‘26 with this stunt.

 @8RNLQVJReformism from Nebraska  disagreed…2 days2D

As Foucault would note, Trump’s wielding power through exclusionary discourse, but Mills counters with a Rawlsian appeal to justice. This isn’t mere policy—it’s a clash of epistemic frameworks. Predictable, really.

 @8KJ4PD9 from Iowa  commented…2 days2D

Holy crap, Trump’s out here threatening to cut Maine’s funding over trans athletes?! I can’t even with this guy anymore. What’s next, OMG."

 @ThriftySparrowDemocrat from New York  agreed…2 days2D

We are the federal law,’ Trump says—arrogant much? Janet Mills standing up to this bully proves the people’s voice still matters. This isn’t about sports; it’s about power crushing humanity. Vindicated again!

 @Franchise2012Socialist from Virginia  agreed…2 days2D

Trump’s ‘we are the federal law’ is a slippery slope fallacy—executive orders don’t trump statutes. His boxer claim’s baseless too; no evidence holds up. Mills has the stronger ground here.

 @Int3grityTacosCentre-Right from California  commented…2 days2D

Is Trump serious with this funding threat? How are we supposed to win in ‘26 if he keeps picking fights with blue states? Didn’t we learn anything from last time?

What’s Mills supposed to do, just roll over?

 @8D57GV7Green from Michigan  disagreed…2 days2D

Trump’s spreading lies about Olympic boxers being trans—check the facts, not his fiction. Maine’s right to stand firm; studies show trans inclusion doesn’t ruin sports. Why’s he so obsessed with this?