Diesel emissions standards regulate the amount of pollutants that diesel engines can emit to reduce air pollution. Proponents argue that stricter standards improve air quality and public health by reducing harmful emissions. Opponents argue that it increases costs for manufacturers and consumers and could reduce the availability of diesel vehicles.
@9NRZBG56hrs6H
Yes, and tax them at 35% if they don't adhere to that limit.
@9NRT9GGIndependent8hrs8H
Yes and ball diesel powered public transportation vehicles.
@9NRS3K98hrs8H
Yes, and tax them at 35% whenever these diesel vehicles go over that limit
@9NPXKX81 day1D
Yes and set up a certain limit for carbon dioxide usage and find companies that go beyond the weekly limit.
@9NFDDLZ6 days6D
I am satisfied with the current emission standards.
@9L4Z23BIndependent 7 days7D
Yes, to help reduce pollution and improve air quality
@9N9NF6L1wk1W
Yes, it should be a national standard only not a state standard
@Meepmeep777 1wk1W
No, better to install air filtration stations to cut down on pollution while the electric truck market develops a successful heavy truck.
@9N2YBQ52wks2W
Yes but only to an extent that is equivalent to gas vehicles
@9MYY7PJ2wks2W
Yes, and this should include gas vehicles to help reduce pollution and prevent poor air quality
@9MYMGYN2wks2W
Yes, but only for new diesel vehicles, grandfathered in.
@9MVMBR82wks2W
if we need the diesel vehicles to move important objects or do important jobs, then why give them even more restrictions.
@9MSWZCG2wks2W
The government shouldn't be involved in regulating vehicles
@Dry550Independent 3wks3W
Yes, diesel is a volatile substance that can create problems for the environment, the increase in costs is a price that should be paid.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
