Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestions1yr ago

If you had to argue for or against life sentences, which side would you choose, and why?

+
Expand
+ Settings

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of

@9VK759Q
#1 Engaged Voter
Test Your Knowledge

9 Replies

 @9L2PJQ3 from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

I would argue that life sentences should be limited to serious crimes like murder and rape

 @9L2WGFT from California  disagreed…1yr1Y

I do not agree that rape is a serious crime, it does not fall into the same category as murder. Murder is a serious crime and therefore should be a life sentence. Rape is a crime as well, but I don't feel like someone should be sent to prison for life.

 @9L2VP69 from Ohio  disagreed…1yr1Y

25-30 years in a cell is enough time to change a person, and make them atone, especially in a future system that is reformed to focus on rehabilitation

 @9L2P8CW from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

I would argue on the agreement side for life sentences, only if there is justifiable evidence that that person is guilty of the crome

 @9L4BQMP from Texas  agreed…1yr1Y

Time is a reasonable punishment for those who have committed crimes with large enough evidence to them guilty.

 @9L2P2RT from California  answered…1yr1Y

Against, if they get life they might as well just die

 @9L2P4Z9answered…1yr1Y

life sentences because some people dont change and cant be aloud back

 @9L2P9X7 from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

mental facilities or rehabilitation facilities so that eventually, even at an old age, they could return to society. not everyone is ir-redeemable.

 @9L2PHQW from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

I am for it because if you did the crime you have to pay the time.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6mos6MO

Trump hits ‘nasty’ Michelle Obama at Atlanta rally

Former President Trump attacked former first lady Michelle Obama during his rally in Atlanta on Monday, calling her “nasty” after Obama lobbed attacks at the former president while stumping for Vice President Harris.“You know who’s nasty to me? Michelle Obama,” Trump told supporters in Atlanta.“I always tried to be so nice and respectful. Oh, she opened up a little bit of — a little bit of a box. She opened up a little bit of something. Oh, she was nasty. Shouldn’t be that way. That was a big mistake that she made,” he added.His remarks come after Obama criticized Trump during a Michigan rally on Saturday, at one point mentioning “Donald Trump’s gross incompetence.”“I hope that you’ll forgive me if I’m a little angry that we are indifferent to his erratic behavior, his obvious mental decline, his history as a convicted felon, a known slum lord, a predator found liable for sexual abuse, all of this while we pick apart Kamala’s answers from interviews that he doesn’t even have the courage to do, y’all,” she said in Kalamazoo, Mich.The heated rhetoric underscores the increasingly personal tone the presidential election has taken between the two campaigns roughly one week out from the election.An aggregate of national surveys compiled by The Hill/Decision Desk HQ shows Harris slightly ahead at close to 49 percent support while Trump is at 48 percent.

▲  3316 replies