Conversation thread

Most wind turbines are company made, and no, theyre not damaging the economy.

If they come at the expense of fossil fuels, the cheapest and most efficient energy source known to man, and a necessity for the economic progress of our Republic, then yes, they damage the economy. And if you bothered to look things up, rather than accepting the CNN narrative, you'd know that billions of dollars (More than the ENTIRE FEDERAL BUDGET should be) are currently going to green energy, and many of this in direct subsidies to businesses.

False, green energy options (including nuclear fission) are the most cost effective energy sources for over 85% of the word population. Solar can serve as an assist element for almost all housing or buildings as it’s currently the cheapest energy source out there. Nuclear power is the most reliable by far as it’s capable of holding a near constant and massive amount of energy production that dwarfs the entire coal industry easily. All we’d need is about 2000 of the medium sized types and we could literally power the entire world. Wind energy is a much more reliable method…  Read more than solar, and some wind turbines can power a neighborhood, and wind turbine companies in Europe are showing a large amount of success in their orders. Take Vestas for example, a Denmark wind company that has taken orders of about 66,000 turbines, and has created 157 GW of energy in its lifetime. Nuclear reactors haven’t really broken far past 1 GW of energy per reactor, so Vestas has contributed massively at a positive impact to the economy.

Did the Bible say "You shall surrender the rights I have given you to the elite ruling class of the future age, and allow them to violate my command not to steal by plundering your hard-earned money for the sake of an unproven theory they contrived." No. You'll notice environmental stewardship was a task prescribed at the INDIVIDUAL level, NOT THE GOVERNMENT LEVEL.