That is no life for a child, and there is ALWAYS a reason
@GloopdevIndependent1yr1Y
“That is no life for a child”
Incredibly presumptuous of you to make that decision for the child. This is nothing but a preventative mercy killing. Your argument is "Killing this baby is okay because I do not see their life as worthwile". Do you see now why we oppose your death cult?
What child? It is a fetus in the womb, not a conscious person. People usually aren't making that decision for the fetus, they are making it for themselves and their lives, hopes, and dreams.
@Lancia-Delta-S4 3mos3MO
A lot of people who talk about abortion are too mentally impaired, by which I mean psycho/sociopathic to understand empathy. So I ask you, how would you feel, because apparently all you care about is yourself and how YOU feel, how would you feel if your mother decided to abort you to save some money and bypass childbirth? How would you feel if your mother considered the about $3k required to pay for medical bills and adoption, worth more than your life? You would stand with me and the millions of aborted babies against this awful, selfish, sociopathic crime of unnecessary abortion. And it is scientifically proven that a fetus is conscious, and therefore alive.
@MAGA_Deplorable6mos6MO
Even if "it isn't a child," –– obviously that's stupid but let's pretend for the sake of argument –– the "fetus" would still be worth a child. Just like a check for one million dollars is worth one million dollars, a biological organism that will, in just weeks, become a human being, would be morally worth as much as a human being. Thus it would be worth far more than any blue whale or African elephant or any other species of wildlife, and worth far more protection than all of them. Your argument is so stupid that even if you were right, you'd still be wrong.
That's the stupidest claim in eternity. The number of couples waiting to adopt children in this country (2 million) is more than 250% greater than the annual abortion figures in this country (approx. 700,000). If you are legitimately afraid you can't care for the child, one of these 2 million decent couples will gladly raise it to stop you from murdering it. There's no such thing as an unwanted life with stats like these.
@9CJ6CB61yr1Y
I explained my point in the other message you posted, though I’ll continue with extra reasoning. There aren’t always ways out of that situation where an abortion isn’t done. That could would be tied to her and her husband, and as such, would likely be required by the court to stay. There’s a thousand possibilities, and she DID consider adoption, but that wasn’t the life she wanted for her child. She didn’t WANT to do the abortion, but she felt she HAD to, and I will not judge her in the slightest for it. A situation is always more complicated than simply providing a sentence-long solution.
I don't give a d@mn if how murderers "feel" about their decision to murder someone, or how they justified it, what I care about is how the FLAMING VICTIM "felt" about having his right to life blatantly and violently denied in the must inhuman and abominable way. That's the problem with the issue of Life – people's emotions are convoluting the discussion and distorting rational thought and consideration of fundamental moral laws like THOU SHALT NOT MURDER. Abortionists emotions have no place in an issue that means life or death to six million children worldwide per year. The only emotion we should experience is righteous anger at the blood of these innocent children, slaughtered in cold blood, their bodies, torn limb from limb, crying out to God for vengeance.
@B3VKVWT4mos4MO
“The only emotion we should experience is righteous anger at the blood of these innocent children, slaughtered in cold blood, their bodies, torn limb from limb, crying out to God for vengeance.”
Abortion is often done when the baby is early in development, I do not fully support abortions past 18 weeks as I do think that they can be harmful, but they are hardly "slaughtered in cold blood" as you say, they are often medically euthanized through drugs, the same way a dying dog would. Stop fear-mongering saying that these children are sail and educate yourself on the methods of abortion.
@B4HPYNB3mos3MO
sometimes they are actually torn apart and when they arent it is still murdering an innocent child.
@9TC4KHH10mos10MO
Stop having sex with everything you come across you **** ing stupid whores! There would be no children if you were so **** ing easy!
@GloopdevIndependent1yr1Y
“six million children worldwide per year”
Correction: OVER 70 MILLION
@B4HPYNB3mos3MO
i think it is more like 73 million a year CONFIRMED worldwide which insane, its possibly more than how many died in the entierty of WW11 the worst conflict in history. Also dont swear the Bible says not too:)
@Lancia-Delta-S4 3mos3MO
So instead she wanted to murder the child instead of giving it to loving parents because she didn't "want that life for her child." The life she chose for her child was death. And you say you won't judge someone because they decided to murder a child instead of putting it up for adoption, likely because she was too afraid of childbirth and wanted to get back to sleeping around with every guy she came in contact with.
Join in on more popular conversations.
