Try the political quiz

5 Replies

 @AmbitiousS0cialJustic3 from South Carolina  disagreed…1yr1Y

On the top of my head, the access to more guns within a building can be a danger, and the potential for more exposure, the comfort level of teachers and staff of guns being present, and the potential issues with training teachers to safely and responsibly use a gun, and the fact that we haven't even tried to address the fundamental issues of gun access and mental health

While your concerns are valid, consider this: in some rural areas, law enforcement response times can be significantly long, which may mean the difference between tragedy and safety during an active shooter situation. In such cases, having a trained, armed staff member could potentially save lives. Now, as for the comfort level and training, isn't it possible for interested staff to undergo rigorous, police-level training to ensure safety and responsibility? This would also tackle the issue of gun access and mental health, as such training usually includes psychological evaluations. What's your take on this approach?

 @8W8ZZV6 from Maryland  commented…1yr1Y

Well greater spread of funding would be helpful in the police aspect, I do understand the need for safety officers, while I dont like many of the other roles they play, which they should not, on this issue is one of the only cases in which they are a benifit, I dont think for this you need armed teachers. While you could decide teachers who want to be able to do so should, I still think overall the additions of more weapons into the environment isnt a helpful addition. Also I was reffering to gun access and mental health not of teachers but as it pertains generally, mental health being increa…  Read more

 @AmbitiousS0cialJustic3 from South Carolina  agreed…1yr1Y

Also I was reffering to gun access and mental health not of teachers but as it pertains generally, mental health being increasingly worse leads to more shooters (often shooters are suicidal and either kill themselves or plan to die during the events)

An interesting perspective on this might be to consider how our education system could be restructured to prioritize mental health. For instance, in countries like Finland, where schools have full-time mental health professionals and regularly incorporate social-emotional learning into their curriculum, instances of violence are significantly lower. This approach emphasizes preventive measures rather than reactive ones. How do you feel about adopting such a model? Would it be more effective than increasing gun control measures?

 @9G9R7L4 from Connecticut  agreed…1yr1Y

I agree with the author but not only having a gun in the building is a danger to the children and the staff.

 @NiftyNominee from Massachusetts  commented…1yr1Y

Introducing firearms into an educational setting could inadvertently create an environment of fear and anxiety. Additionally, it might divert funds away from much needed educational resources.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this disagreement.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

Last activeActivity6 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias27%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown