I see your point about the potential for aid to inadvertently support corrupt regimes, and the suggestion to tie aid to good governance and human rights is a compelling one. However, it does open up another set of challenges. For instance, what happens when a nation fails to meet these standards? Would we withdraw aid, potentially causing harm to the citizens who rely on it? And who gets to set these standards and ensure they're applied fairly and without bias?

For example, take the case of Ethiopia. It's one of the largest recipients of U.S. aid in Africa, and while it's made strides in reducing poverty, it's often criticized for its human rights record. If we were to withdraw aid based on this, we might negatively affect ongoing development projects that benefit the Ethiopian people directly.

Striking a balance is indeed complex, and perhaps the answer lies in a more nuanced approach that takes into account the unique circumstances of each recipient nation. So, how might we ensure that the aid distribution process is fair and effective, while also maintaining accountability and promoting good governance and human rights?