Try the political quiz
@9BVVDXVRepublicanAnswersSocial IssuesLGBT Adoption RightsStarted 2yrs agoActive 9mos ago

No, because that kind of stuff is just mental illness and is not right for a kid who has been traumatized to put that kind of stuff in their head

5 Replies

 @clarinetistclara from New Jersey  disagreed…2yrs2Y

It's important to note that being gay is not a mental illness. The American Psychological Association, among other professional organizations, has long recognized that homosexuality is a natural variation of human sexuality. Instead, we should focus on the ability of prospective parents to provide a loving, stable, and supportive environment for a child. Research has shown that children raised by same-sex couples fare just as well as those raised by heterosexual couples in terms of emotional, cognitive, and social development. What are your thoughts on this perspective, and can you suggest a solution that ensures the well-being of the child while addressing your concerns?

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  commented…2yrs2Y

Some biased research right there

  @Renaldo-MoonGreen  from Pennsylvania  commented…9mos9MO

Expert LGBT Adoption Rights

Phycologists have to do studies related to phycology, same as a qualified medical professional has to do surgery.

 @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  requested a reference…2yrs2Y

Please provide references for the claims you made in this message.

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  agreed…2yrs2Y

Yes! Completely agree!

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this answer.

@9BVVDXV

Last activeActivity4 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias0%Active in
Answers  4 Social Issues  2 Climate Change  1 LGBT Adoption Rights  1 environment  1
PartyRepublicanLocationUnknown

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…8mos8MO

Death, Denial, and Silence: Inside China’s Push to Bury Zhuhai’s Devastating SUV Attack

Outside the sports center in the southern city of Zhuhai where a 62-year-old man had plowed an S.U.V. into a crowd, killing at least 35 people, workers on Wednesday quickly removed bouquets of flowers left by grieving residents. Uniformed police officers and officials in plainclothes shooed away bystanders and warned them not to take photos. At hospitals where patients were taken after the attack — at least 43 more people were injured — local officials sat outside the intensive care units, blocking journalists from speaking with family members.On the Chinese internet, censors were mobilized to delete videos, news articles and commentaries about the attack. Almost 24 hours had passed before officials divulged details about the assault, which happened on Monday, including the death toll. Their statement offered limited details, and they have held no news conferences.The response was a precise enactment of the Chinese government’s usual playbook after mass tragedies: Prevent any nonofficial voices, including eyewitnesses and survivors, from speaking about the event. Spread assurances of stability. Minimize public displays of grief.The goal is to stifle potential questions and criticism of the authorities, and force the public to move on as quickly as possible. And to a large degree, it appeared to be working.Though many residents of Zhuhai, the city of 2.4 million where the attack happened, were clearly shaken, they said on Wednesday they had not questioned the delay in information, attributing it to the government’s need to first sort out what had happened. A steady stream of people arrived by foot or taxi to lay flowers at the sports center’s entrance, but when officials took away the flowers and told the people not to linger, they quickly complied.Local governments have also vowed in recent months to spend more time screening for people who have experienced “failures,” after a spate of violent attacks, including several cases in which schoolchildren were stabbed.But officials were also clearly on the lookout for any deeper scrutiny of the Zhuhai killings. Videos and photos of the scene of the attack showed only as grayed-out squares on Weibo, a social media platform. Blog posts urging people not to treat violent attacks as isolated incidents, but rather to look deeper for potential social causes, disappeared.

▲  177 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…10mos10MO

Israel Missile Strike Kills 5 U.S. Aid Workers

The Israeli military fired a missile, killing five people in the lead vehicle of an aid convoy in Gaza that it claimed had been hijacked by militants.The military also said it killed a top Hamas commander and two other fighters Friday as its large-scale operations in the West Bank continued into a third day.The D.C.-based nonprofit that organized the convoy, American Near East Refugee Aid, known as Anera, described it as a “shocking incident” in a statement Friday and said that those killed were from a local transportation company. It was urgently seeking more details about the incident.The convoy had been delivering medical supplies and fuel to an Emirati-run hospital in Rafah, Palestine Country Director Sandra Rasheed said in the statement to The Washington Post, and its route was coordinated with the Israel Defense Forces.Thursday’s incident is one of several such attacks this week. In remarks to the United Nations Security Council on Thursday, the U.S. representative, Robert Wood, referred to an incident that occurred Sunday, according to U.N. officials, in which he said the IDF fired toward a UNICEF vehicle.On Tuesday, at least 10 rounds were fired into a World Food Program vehicle, which the United Nations blamed on Israel and prompted WFP to temporarily suspend staff movement across Gaza. Wood said the Biden administration was “deeply alarmed” by Tuesday’s shooting and urged Israel to “immediately rectify the issues within their system that allowed this to happen.”

▲  168 replies