Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHAnswersPolitical IdeologyStarted 3yrs agoActive 3mos ago

Natural Rights

You believe that individuals should be free to exercise their inherent rights to life, liberty, and property without undue interference from the government or others.

The "Natural Rights" political ideology is a philosophical concept that asserts that certain rights are inherent by virtue of human nature, endowed by nature, God, or a transcendent source, and that these can be understood universally through human reason. These rights are often viewed as being fundamental to human existence, such as the right to life, liberty, and property.

The concept of natural rights originated during the Enlightenment period, a time of significant intellectual growth and societal change in the 17th and 18th centuries. The idea was heavily influenced…  

Read more
+
Expand
+ Settings

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of

@9VK759Q
#1 Engaged Voter
Test Your Knowledge

313 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If freedom of speech is a natural right, where, if at all, should lines be drawn, and who should draw them?

 @9TFRYB9  from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

I think you should be free to say what you want, but not free of any consequences stemming from what you say.

 @9TGPFX7 from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

All speech is free speech, including harmful speech that may be considered hate speech.

 @9TGDTZFDemocrat  from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

The line should be drawn when people are being disrespectful

 @9JB6N5ZRepublican from Nevada  answered…2yrs2Y

If it gets violent and people get hurt that is where they should draw the line. I think law enforcement should draw them.

 @9JDF6D2agreed…2yrs2Y

because if it gets violent then that's stretching your rights too far its only freedom of speech not freedom of violent.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If you were to witness a rights violation in public, what would compel you to act, and how?

 @9KTYJ8ZDemocrat from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

I would be compelled to act because it would be taking away the rights of others who deserve those rights.

 @9KTYDXLanswered…2yrs2Y

I wouldn't know what to do, I'd probably record and report and maybe say something depending on the situation.

 @9KTYJY4 from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

Another human being getting violated would compel me to act, I would try to prevent it.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How would you prioritize which 'natural rights' to defend if you couldn't choose them all?

 @9L5Y3VY from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

I would defend the 2nd and use it to protect all other rights

 @9L5YR2F from Kentucky  answered…2yrs2Y

I would chose life because the individual and collective rights of self-defense and self-determination

 @9L5Y6NY from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

I think that the natural right to practice any religion, have a family, and make a living should be prioritized.

 @9L5Y63B from Kentucky  answered…2yrs2Y

Natural rights need defended to the point except if someone becomes a sex offender

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Why do you think it is crucial, or not, to fight for the rights of people you've never met?

 @9JF29JPLibertarianfrom Maine  answered…2yrs2Y

I belive the UN has a very good idea of what exactly human rights are. But they are terrible at enforcing them especially in the middle east.

 @9JFTP58Socialist from Maine  agreed…2yrs2Y

The UN is generally a very loose organization, that sees itself as this great enforcer of justice and human rights. But the US and the greedy European countries contribute to it's failures, since it rarely gets authorized to move in. And if it does, it barely does a change. Simply because the US and European country's political interests are the main motivator, and not the protection of human lives.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia  commented…2yrs2Y

Well that’s mostly because it’s not strong and independent, it’s not a fully global body either. It’s “military” is built off of volunteers, and they’re poorly trained or unruly at best.

 @9JJNQ9BRepublican from Michigan  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I'm not sure about the UN but everyone should get the rights we have all agreed to have regardless of who they are or what they've done.

 @9JF2FSB from West Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

Because they are still people at the end of the day. We all have the same bones in our body. They’re human.

 @9JH4BPS from Illinois  agreed…2yrs2Y

they could come from a different country and they could need help trying to make a better living for themselves

 @9JF26F5Democrat from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

because everyone deserves the name natural rights. it is things you deserve for being brought into this world.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How does the idea that some rights are 'natural' affect the way you think about new issues, like climate change or internet privacy?

 @9K8Z7NB from South Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

In newer times, we are slowly having our rights taken. So fighting for your rights and voting the right person is crucial

 @9KGSYCSIndependent from Illinois  agreed…2yrs2Y

Artificial Intelligence takes control of human intellect and originality and needs to be regulated.

 @9KBCS5X from Nevada  agreed…2yrs2Y

The concept of natural rights can shape perspectives on new issues like climate change or internet privacy, influencing whether individuals prioritize certain rights regardless of circumstances.

 @9K8ZGVZ from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

I think about God given rights. I think that climate change doesn't really have an impact however internet privacy does.

 @9K8ZHZX from South Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

If rights are natural then we should care for our natural environment.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3yrs3Y

Do you believe you have rights that no government should be able to take from you; what are they?

 @9H5FZ5XDemocrat from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the persuit of happiness, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion.

 @9H5GJPV from Michigan  answered…3yrs3Y

Yeah the right to voice my own opinion and pick who I want leading me.

 @9H5G9RHRepublican from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

The rights are slowly being stripped from the American People.

 @9H5FVP7 from Tennessee  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes there are certain rights that are not supposed to be taken from us such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Also the freedom of press, assembly, and privacy.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Why do you think some communities or groups might interpret natural rights differently?

 @9HVN7FLDemocrat from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

Differences in cultures, environments and upbringings

 @9HVN6GMWomen’s Equality from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

can identify the fundamental liberties that all human beings require to pursue happiness while living in close proximity to others

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3yrs3Y

Do you think natural rights are truly universal, or do they vary across different societies?

 @9HVMZSP from Nevada  answered…2yrs2Y

Natural rights is very universal as it should not be taken away from whichever country we end up, Natural rights is what humanize society giving laws meaning which every human being should decide for themselves and be able to live as a human whether they have to protect themselves if they have to.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If you could start a movement to better protect a certain right, which right would it be and what would be your first step?

 @9L4VNN9 from Missouri  answered…2yrs2Y

my first step would be to take action where I see a problem. Speaking up about a woman's right to choose attending meetings, voting, etc.

 @9L4VG5G from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

maybe the movement to stop genocide thats currently happening in gaza, take it to social media maybe?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3yrs3Y

Should everyone around the world have the same natural rights, or are some rights specific to certain cultures or societies?

 @9HDBHV5Greenfrom Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

Some cultures have a great religious background that shapes how their society functions, therefore some countries may prioritize other rights. But base human rights are integral.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How do you feel when you see natural rights being violated in the news, and do you react?

 @9KN3T2KWomen’s Equality from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

It makes me sad , because no one should have their natural rights violated its unnecessary an unfair

 @9KN3SKR from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

I disagree with it I don't believe that "Natural Rights" should be violated because that is something that is state in our constitution as Americans.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3yrs3Y

Imagine a world where everyone completely respects each other's rights; what does it look like?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How do you address conflicts between your rights and the needs of the environment?

 @9LHV4RR from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

We need to find a healthy balance and better alternatives.

 @9LHTFLQLibertarian from Maryland  answered…2yrs2Y

while i am a liberaterian i do believe that there needs to be some regulation

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How has your understanding of your own rights influenced the way you view authority figures?

 @9KSF57C  from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

From my understanding I see authority figures as they should be, people of authority. I will follow their orders and I will use my right to free speech to question them but I will not be overtly hostile or demeaning unless they do it first.

 @9KSF4N9 from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

I go with the people that they and focus mainly on American Citizens

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If someone were to disrespect your rights today, how would you respond to uphold them?

 @9L3P2RL from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

I would be incredibly annoyed, tell them how wrong they are, and then walk away.

 @9L3NSXC from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

I would give them a rebuttal, tell them to not be an A hole, and then walk away

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How do you think technological advancements should consider our inherent freedoms?

 @9LH76QNIndependent from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

As social standards change, things we as a country allow, so should natural rights but don't eliminate any only add what's essential

 @9LH6YP5Peace and Freedom from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

Make me free using technology, socially and economically

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3yrs3Y

Do you think natural rights should evolve over time, or are they timeless and unchanging?

 @9HGXXJQ from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

Natural Rights evolve over time due to changes in both culutre and the coubtry

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3yrs3Y

Would you give up some of your fundamental freedoms in exchange for guaranteed security?

 @9HK599T from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes legal privileges or immunities defined in terms of governmental action or inaction, like the rights of due process, habeas corpus, and

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3yrs3Y

Have you ever fought for a right that you believe is natural, and if so, what was the outcome?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3yrs3Y

How do differing cultural values impact the interpretation and respect for natural rights?

 @9HNYND8 from Michigan  answered…3yrs3Y

i think that you should respect the laws of other countrys,just as you whould yours

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3yrs3Y

How would you define freedom, and can it exist without natural rights?

 @9HFTL8Q from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

Without the restrictions that our laws and rights put on us now we wouldn't have freedom and it would be extremely dangerous.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Have you ever noticed a conflict between legal rights and what you believe to be natural rights?

 @9HTD24W from Virginia  commented…2yrs2Y

I believe abortion should be a natural right rather than a legal right because no person should be allowed to tell a women whether or not to have the baby but herself. It should not be forced upon her.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Has a personal experience ever made you truly appreciate a particular freedom you possess?

 @9HVN4XMPeace and Freedom from Idaho  answered…2yrs2Y

that some people shold have some freedome and go where ever thay whant to go in the usa

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

In what ways do you think an individual can stand up for their inherent rights?

 @9HVMNMR from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

They can use their right to free speech to express a wrongness

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3yrs3Y

If you could protect one human right above all others, which would it be and why?

 @9HPXP2Z from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

life, no matter where you are the most important thing is being alive

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

What would you do if you felt one of your basic freedoms was at risk?

 @9HVN7R5 from Missouri  answered…2yrs2Y

I would stand up for what is right and use my freedoms to show the people infringing my rights what is what.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Can you envision a society where no rights are given, only earned; what would that look like?

 @9JDQXTYRepublican from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

when you lose one semester and your gpa is going down and you losing your fafsa and there is no way to fix it. we always need to give people another chance.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3yrs3Y

Can you think of a situation where it might be justifiable to limit someone’s natural rights?

 @9H3N7QK from Indiana  answered…3yrs3Y

I think everyone deserves "Human Rights" unless they are charged with murder or rape.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How can the protection of rights strengthen community bonds and shared identities?

 @9LHT4YQDemocratfrom Guam  answered…2yrs2Y

The protection of individuals' rights under "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" helps us recognize that there is a common ground as to how we should treat others in our communities regardless of expectations set according to race and other differences.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

What role do you think celebrities and influencers should play in the discussion of natural rights?

 @9LG24KP from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

They should have the same roles as everyone else because they are still people

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Do you agree that freedom comes with responsibilities; if so, how do you practice this in your life?

 @9KRNPWNRepublican from Oregon  answered…2yrs2Y

No I like doing burnouts and drifting but cops ruin that

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How can young people today advocate for their natural rights in a way that brings about significant change?

 @9JB4QFP from Michigan  answered…2yrs2Y

The same way it’s always been done - Talk about it, make it social and make people aware of the situation.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3yrs3Y

How do natural rights shape your view on current social or political issues?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How do you approach discussions with peers who may not share your viewpoint on freedoms?

 @9LFCWF7Socialist  from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

I agree with the Constitution for most things and if they are protecting Americans, then so be it. Gun rights are the only more nuanced topic.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How might widely acknowledged natural rights change our approach to international relations?

 @9LCK8NVDemocrat from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

I think we should all have some natural rights but not as many when you come into the us unless your a citizen

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Why might some argue that ensuring everyone's freedoms could come at the expense of their own?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies