Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision

Gay Marriage shouldn't even be a thing, it states in the bible that no men should marry the same sex.

I feel like it wast meant to be man women not man and man or women and women. a male and female is what make people.

Gay marriage shouldn't be a thing because God made man and woman be able to reproduce and be with each other not man and man or woman and woman. there's a reason why you need both genders to procreate and not the same gender

The United States was founded on the principles of the bible therefore if it is against it, it should not be allowed

Marriage is definitionally and ontologically based in the relationship of one man and one woman. Any other combination of human beings is by definition not marriage. If a government is incapable of holding to the basic foundations of reality, it has forfeited its right to govern.

I don't support gay marriage or any kind of LGBTQ. Marriage should be between man and woman. It’s not that hard to understand

Gay marriage is made up and is nonsense. It should be determined by a man and a woman, not a girl and a girl/man and a man

Marriage is not a political decision. It is a sacred thing between two, and such a thing should happen under God's holy observation.

I think we should be free to do whatever we want in our relationships, but when it comes to marriage it should not be aloud to have same sex marriage.

Marriage is a union between man and woman. This is a societal and social norm that has been in human civilization since the dawn of man. Changing the definition of Marriage to fit other unions would erase its meaning.

Marriage is not only religious, it also provides legal rights like taxes, inheritance, and hospital decision-making that the government must protect equally. If marriage were only religious, non-religious people or those rejected by religions would lose those legal protections. The Supreme Court of the United States has affirmed that marriage is a legal right, so the government must stay involved to ensure equality for everyone.

I do not support Gay Marriage. Marriage is between a man and women. No one else. The same gender should not get married.

Gay marriage isnt right and never should be . it is not rght for a man to be with another man. It also isnt good looking on the young.

I don't think gay marriage should be legal. We are born with specific bodies that represent who we are. We can't change those, and we shouldn't. There is no logical reason for same sex marriage, especially if we want to increase the population in America, there is no way to do that with same sex marriage.

It's against most if not all religions to marry someone of the same sex. I feel the government should stay involved and cancel same-sex marriage.

A strong argument for taking the government out of marriage is based on the principle of separation of church and state. In the United States, the government already recognizes civil unions and legal partnerships for tax, inheritance, and healthcare purposes. Marriage, however, has historically been a religious institution defined differently across faiths. By removing the government from defining marriage and instead allowing it to remain a religious decision, it protects religious freedom and prevents the state from redefining something that many people view as sacred. Different religions can then define marriage according to their beliefs, while the government handles legal contracts equally for all citizens.

Allow two people to choose whether or not they want to involve the government in a marriage and if they do they are subject to all the properties of a marriage under government.

It’s impossible to even life a gay life, if you want children, it’s impossible. Only women can do that not MEN. So they have to adopt and feel that child is their own and they know it’s not, it’s hard to exept that the child is not biologically yours but you feel connected to it. It’s impossible to be stocked to someone who you love in which is not you own to take.

como Digo en mis respuestas anteriores El matrimonio es muy sagrado en las Iglesias a mi ver El matrimonio homosexual no esta Bien

I don't understand what this argument is saying but my belief is people have taken religion out of context, being a bunch of rules when it really is about a relationship with Jesus, who died for our sins.

The government being apart of marriage legalizes the marriage, making it official. It has nothing to do with the gays.

I believe that gay marriage is unnecessary. I believe it should be banned or should not be an option because in multiple religions a gay marriage is a sin. Also in the bibles it states that a man and women should be married and not a gay or any other LGTBQ+ marriage is flowing what the bible states.

Marriage also has legal benefits like taxes, inheritance, hospital visitation, and parental rights. Because these are legal matters, the government needs to be involved so all couples are treated equally under the law.

Because marriage is a thing between 2 people that like each other a lot they don’t need the government to be involved

Engaged Gay Marriage

If you don't want to marry a person the same gender as you because of your religion (or really any other reason), that's fine. But please just let other people do what they would like as long as it isn't hurting you.

Marriage was always made from religions in the first place so why should the government have a say on it, I am sorry there isn't any other religions still alive to support it but religions should at the very least exist for pure intend as in with real care and not so people can have all the sex they want and their own selfish HUMAN desires, this is why I trust DOGS and ROBOTS more than HUMANS. I don't want to live on this planet anymore if all there is is just more hate, sex, lies, and fighting for any reason HUMANS can find as to gain for themselves.

They don't provide anything to society, as they aren't bringing in new children to the country, and they are allowing those with mental illnesses to be able to live under one roof.

Engaged Gay Marriage

The reason for marriage should be based of feeling rather than financial decisions and the government should treat all people equal despite personal feelings

The only religious decisions that matter are made by the One True Church, and all marriages are between one man and one woman.

Government recognition ensures legal protections, equal rights, and prevents discrimination; leaving it purely religious would deny these rights to couples outside certain faiths

I don't think two men should be able to marry each other because they cant have kids and its a waste of human life

I believe that God creates each person with purpose and intention. Many religions emphasize that humans are made in God's image and that our bodies are part of that design. Because of this, I believe that changing one's biological sex through transition conflicts with how God created us.

Same sex marriages can be legalized I guess, but should not be supported culturally and public services should not be forced to provide and help aid in same sex marriages.

The Mayor of a Town/City is able to express Religous Laws aslong as the city agrees with it, however Gay Marriage in general is a NO in USA.

Because in the bible God created two genders male or female and he said in Genesis 3:8 that female are the missing rib and that no man shall be alone.

Gay Marriage is stupid. I believe it should be banned because in the bible it states that a man and a women should be married so gay marriage is not following what the bible says also in the bible and book of Mormon no one is in a gay relationship and they still got a lot done.

The most compelling counter-argument to the position that the government should exit the marriage sphere and delegate it solely to religious institutions centers on the fundamental legal and civil nature of the marriage contract. Currently, a government-issued marriage license is not a religious endorsement but a secular legal instrument that automatically confers over a thousand specific, essential rights and protections, including inheritance, joint tax filing eligibility, hospital visitation rights, and presumption of parentage for children. Removing the government would abolish this stand…  Read moreardized, cost-effective framework, forcing citizens to rely on complex, expensive, and inconsistent private contracts (like wills and powers of attorney) to secure basic protections. This shift would disproportionately harm vulnerable populations and children, while also undermining the national legal uniformity that ensures a marriage recognized in one state is recognized in all others, thus confusing the legal status of millions of committed relationships.

Gay Marriage is stupid. I believe it should be banned because in the bible it states that a man and a women should be married so gay marriage is not following what the bible says also in the bible and book of Mormon no one is in a gay relationship and they still got a lot done.

Religion has very differing opinions, even within the same religious institution so this matter should not be left up to the church

Gay marriage is not a natural union. I don’t support it. Neither should the government. It should not be criminalised either.

I really do agree on the religious decision, I don't support gay marriage nor any other marriage with the same identity. JEsus made adam and eve, not two boys or two girls.

Gay marriage shouldn't be legal because its a big sin in religion and the peolple who do it are dark and twisted

Marriage between a man and a woman is a social good. It benefits children in almost every metric. Government has an interest in supporting things that benefit the welfare of society and marriage between a man and woman does exactly that.

If the government gets out of marriage, gay couples couples could lose legal protections like healthcare and taxes.

The practice of marriage outside of religion is a way of providing a couple with certain benefits and guarantees. People are free to engage in a relationship with whoever they want and deserve the governmental benefits (taxes, property ownership, parental rights) enjoyed by anyone else. The practice of marriage in a religious institution is and should be treated as a separate practice.

Putting the government into the issue helps show people why it is wrong, instead of making it a choice. If it ends up being a religious decision than the people that already want it will just do it anyways.

If you take the government out of marriage, the legal benefits received by married couples wouldn't be obtained.

I think gay marriage is against religion because in the bible it’s all man and woman no man and mam or women and women

I don't think that gay marriage is a good thing or a moral thing because of my Christian stance on life.

I do not know if it is possible to separate government of people and religious decisions. In nature, if the intention is to govern people then you will run into spiritual and moral conflicts.

2 people of the same gender should not be able to get married. Jesus made 2 genders male and female.

It is not right and the only reason it exist is because people want to be different and probably had trauma when they were younger so they do it for attention. I don't really care if this response is immature.

I think gay marriage should be allowed but not in any country I live in as it breaks the rules and sets of the bible by putting to of the same gender together which should not be allowed.

If government removed itself from the church it will be just like what happened in European history all over again, while I don’t support gay marriage, that doesn’t mean that it should be illegal because everyone should have free will, not “controlled will.” I don’t support it but it shouldn’t be illegal.

I believe that Gay marriage should be illegal and should be illegal to recognize it government wise and can only be accepted by the people that are gay.

Our country and our civilisation is founded on certain values and those values are extremely important. One of those values is the meaning of marriage. Marriage is (should be I should say) by definition between a man and a woman. There are few arguments apart from this in regards to this debate. It's not really based on factual evidence

One common argument against removing the government from marriage and making it solely a religious decision, particularly in the context of gay marriage, centers on the vast number of legal rights and benefits tied to civil marriage.
Here's a breakdown of the counter-argument:
1. Loss of Legal Rights and Protections:
Civil marriage, recognized by the government, provides numerous legal rights and protections at both state and federal levels. These include, but are not limited to, benefits related to Social Security, veterans' affairs, pensions, military bases, inheritance, hospital…  Read more visitation, tax benefits, and family leave.
Removing the government from marriage would eliminate these protections, potentially leaving individuals, especially in same-sex relationships, vulnerable in areas like medical emergencies, inheritance disputes, and tax matters.
2. Impact on Same-Sex Couples:
Historically, same-sex couples have faced legal and social discrimination, including moral and religious censure.
Civil unions, a form of legal recognition offered in some states before the legalization of same-sex marriage, provided some state-level protections but lacked the full range of federal benefits and the social recognition of marriage.
Making marriage solely a religious institution would essentially re-create a two-tiered system, denying same-sex couples equal rights and potentially forcing them to navigate a patchwork of state-level recognition or the complexities of domestic partnerships, if available.
This could reinforce social stigma and perceived discrimination against same-sex couples, impacting their health and well-being.
3. Separation of Church and State:
The U.S. government is not a religious entity, and the separation of church and state is a foundational principle.
If marriage were solely a religious decision, it would undermine this principle by intertwining government and religious functions and potentially giving certain religious beliefs undue influence over a fundamental social institution.
4. Societal Impact:
Government recognition of marriage also plays a role in fostering stable families and contributing to the well-being of society as a whole.
Marriage has historically been associated with benefits such as lower poverty rates and improved health outcomes. Removing the government's role could weaken these societal benefits.
In essence, removing the government from marriage could have significant negative consequences for individuals and society by eroding legal protections, particularly for marginalized groups, and compromising the separation of church and state.

This is a true statement (God defines marriage, not the government), but God blesses nations whose laws are consistent with His.

I think gay marriage goes against lots of views religiously you are supposed to have kids and that is how they are made when people are born I do however think the government should stay out of marriages and not make it more complicated.

Marriage involves sharing property. All contracts are acknowledged by the government so they can fairly enforce them.

the government should be allowed to permit gay marriages, and if you want to do that and they don't support it you can leave and go somewhere were it is supported

The government should really be involved in marriage. Churches should not be required to marry anyone they don’t want to.

Marriage is a covenant between God, Man, and Woman in my religion. That said, I am open to and supportive of a legally binding contract (civil union license or certificate) between any two loving, consenting adults in order to merge financial, proprietary, medical, and other decisions, obligations, and responsibilities, however. I think the term "marriage" should be kept for the religious definition and the term "civil union" should be kept for the secular definition.

The claim "Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision." presupposes that the goals government and religion have no overlap in this sphere. However, this is not true in totality. There is some overlap. For example, both religion and political authorities are concerned with the common good of society. Now, since the common good of society falls into both the government and religious sphere, it follows that the government has a role in promoting marriage.

Gay marriage is very bad and unnatural, it is biology a man and women create life together not a man and a man it is very bad for our country.

Marrige is for family, the only way to create a family is with a man and a woman who are married, so there is no point of two people of the same gender being married

None of it government shouldnt even promote this kind of pratice were like the only country that does this bullstuff

Absolutely not, gays are not natural. Marriage and childbirth are natural and should be upheld by the government. The government should not allow unnatural things to happen.

I agree that it should be decided religiously. But as a Christian, I would just get rid of gay marriage altogether.

Don't support any type of LGBTQ+. It's not very hard to pick who you want marry and just the same person as gender as you.

IF your using the argument of taking the government out of law binding interaction then, how will reconition be applied and tax benefits, as well as the love is lve arguement, should that be allowed too?