Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
@9GGD5TP 3yrs3Y
Top Agreement
Yes, Public Transportation is essential its more sustainable than cars, not saying I don't like cars, and it will actually be more helpful to our city and surrounding cities and even states to travel on a more affordable and faster level like trains.
In 2019, the New York City Subway system required nearly $17 billion in operating expenses, which was heavily subsidized by taxpayers. The increased spending did no lead to improved services. Between 1996 and 2015, despite a 25% increase in spending, the U.S. public transit saw a decrease in ridership by about 6%.
@9KSYZK2Independent2yrs2Y
@9GGDQPC3yrs3Y
I am also of the belief that free college should be an option given to all potential students as every individual has the right to have resources to better their qaulity of life or simply be able to pursue an education because they want to.
@9H83MWG3yrs3Y
You do have the right to have resource to better your quality of life. This resource is called a job. It is very much possible to go to an in state college and live at home while working and still be debt free afterward. Even not debt free almost everyone still has a chance to pursue education if they want to.
@9GGF3GT3yrs3Y
@9GYYPY3 3yrs3Y
Funding for public transportation can help improve the other issues as well. For example, it helps with the issue of climate change. According to 𝘜𝘊𝘓𝘈 𝘛𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, "Every vehicle on the road releases an average of one pound of CO2 per mile driven. Compared with driving alone, taking public transportation reduces CO2 emissions by 45%, decreasing pollutants in the atmosphere and improving air quality. It's estimated that public transportation in the U.S. saves 37 million metric tons of carbon dioxide annually..." (Pei).
Work Cited:
Pei, Andy. “5 Environmental Benefits of Sustainable Transportation.” UCLA Transportation, 7 Oct 2021, transportation.ucla.edu/blog/5-environmental-benefits-sustainable-transportation. Accessed 14 November 2023.
@9GYZQP73yrs3Y
help people afford electric vehicles at the same price as a cheap car cause then theyll release less gas emmisions in the future and theyd be able to get around better or convert public transit electric
@9KSYZK2Independent2yrs2Y
@9GJTZNX 3yrs3Y
Cars produce smog, and regardless of your views on climate change, it is not good for our health to be inhaling lots of it. Reducing cars on the road by increasing investment in public transport will give those who do not want to drive the option to take other forms of transport and it will give those who cannot afford a car a reliable option. Most citizens will benefit, even those not intending on taking public transport as their travel times will decrease. Public transport investment will also make cities a source of pride and strength, and it will also increase economic activity in a city.
@9GLC2BV 3yrs3Y
If we give citizens viable options for alternative transportation, they will choose what works best for themselves. The problem is there aren’t great options for alternatives. We invest heavily in cars in this country while we should have affordable options for not just inner city travel, but also commuting from suburbian areas and cross-country high speed rail systems. We are a nation of innovation and it’s time we start behaving as one instead of just claiming it. Building greater transportation systems that don’t just rely on cars will enable better access to work, childc… Read more
@9GL96ZNWomen’s Equality3yrs3Y
I agree with this, i think there should be more available bus routes that travel all over the city, as well and trains, the United kingdom has trains that travel through all their cities and it is very beneficial to them
@9JDB9JC2yrs2Y
The U.S. isn't the Uk though at all. Just because it worked for the UK doesn't mean the same implementation of utilizing trains alongside buses wouldn't work for the U.S. as our land is much greater, state and federal government operates differently, etc.
@9KSYZK2Independent2yrs2Y
@9GLD9Y93yrs3Y
@9FP2M7F3yrs3Y
By switching from car-dependency to public transportation, we can save money on expensive and redundant highway infrastructure, slow climate change by reducing the amount of combustion-engines on the road, oil prices won't impact citizens as much, and our cities are better off for it. Many people believe that it won't be possible for the U.S. to have extensive public transportation but they forget that the United States was built by railroads and there have been several cities with efficient tram-lines but most have been removed in favor of private automobiles.
@9GRV52KWomen’s Equality3yrs3Y
people that dont have cars might have a more diffucult time getting to tehir jobs. Whithout a car in this country you can't move or do anyhting.
@9GRVS5Y3yrs3Y
@9GRVZ953yrs3Y
@9FRGZBV3yrs3Y
It would heavily decrease the use of cars and even the need for it which would cut emissions, cut gas prices, and be way cheaper for the impoverished Americans. It would also reduce the need for roads and make cities more walk-able which would create a stronger community which would make it safer to go out even if you were a kid by yourself.
@9GSL8RM3yrs3Y
@9GYSDSS3yrs3Y
Public transportation budgets should be increased because with the American car centered infrastructure that we currently have public transportation is a necessity that a lot of lower class people rely on for their day to day life. Increasing public transportation budgets would also help in climate control by reducing the number of people who need to take cars everywhere because that’s the only way to get places.
Public transportation offers a multitude of compelling benefits, supported by data and statistics. Environmentally, it significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions per passenger mile compared to individual cars, contributing to the fight against climate change. Economically, investments in public transit stimulate job creation and promote business development. Individually, it proves more cost-effective than private car ownership, saving commuters thousands of dollars annually. Safety statistics demonstrate that public transit is a safer mode of transportation than private vehicles. Additio… Read more
@B3VGV2T 11mos11MO
Arguments supporting public transportation emphasize its positive impact across multiple sectors, including environmental, economic, social, and individual well-being.
Environmental benefits
Public transportation demonstrably reduces traffic congestion and reliance on single-occupancy vehicles, contributing to significantly improved air quality and a smaller carbon footprint.
Communities with strong public transportation systems are able to reduce the nation's carbon emissions by 63 million metric tons annually.
Economic advantages
Public transit helps individuals save money by reducin… Read more
@9GQ4T2S3yrs3Y
@9H3NBF3Independent3yrs3Y
@9FPNWZP3yrs3Y
@9GY9Z6J3yrs3Y
@9FTSX5G3yrs3Y
@9FQ9BDM3yrs3Y
@9FPXDM53yrs3Y
@9GSVCQ33yrs3Y
@9GS26843yrs3Y
@9GSRPTF3yrs3Y
Say a country like Japan uses more public transportation than a major metropolitan city in the US or any small town in the US. In 2019 the amount of people using just the train in Japan was 25.19 billion. However the US was 32.5 million. Given how much larger the US is compared to Japan the numbers are shocking showing how much more used and better Japan is at innovating for the people.
@9GG4RKM3yrs3Y
@9GHCC2V3yrs3Y
@9GWKF48Progressive3yrs3Y
@9FLBD973yrs3Y
If we give citizens viable options for alternative transportation, they will choose what works best for themselves. The problem is there aren’t great options for alternatives. We invest heavily in cars in this country while we should have affordable options for not just inner city travel, but also commuting from suburbian areas and cross-country high speed rail systems. We are a nation of innovation and it’s time we start behaving as one instead of just claiming it. Building greater transportation systems that don’t just rely on cars will enable better access to work, childc… Read more
@9GXH8LD3yrs3Y
User penetration is projected to be 35.7% in 2023 and 35.4% by 2027. Americans use public transportation 34 million times a day. Public transportation is a $79 billion industry that employs more than 430,000 people. Approximately 6,800 organizations provide public transportation in the United States.
@9FT6JH73yrs3Y
@9FW9S29Progressive 3yrs3Y
Every $1 invested in public transportation generates $5 in economic returns. Every $1 billion invested in public transportation creates and supports 50,000 jobs, according to the American Public Transportation Association.
https://www.apta.com/news-publications/public-transportation-facts/
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.14762
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410246/
https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20210630.810356/
https://scholars.org/contribution/why-public-transit-helps-young-people-get-work
https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/take-action-to-improve-health/what-works-for-health/strategies/public-transportation-systems
@9FNYPVN3yrs3Y
Spain's High speed rail infrastructure added 60 k beds to hotels in 17 years along Spain's oldest High speed rail rout. Spain is absolutely different to the US as the US is large with many areas who's economies are small enough to not weren't High speed rail however we do need fast clean links between both coasts.
@9G8F33P3yrs3Y
The current public transportation system is extremely underfunded, it is missing some of the key components that a public transportation system needs to be viable. It leaves little to no options for transportation for those who are low income, therefore resulting in more unnecessary costs that could in turn lead to poverty, homelessness, starvation, or worse. Simply all because of an outdated, underfunded system.
@9G69TFB3yrs3Y
Most directly, trains and buses create less pollution-causing emissions than would be created if the same transit riders traveled in individual cars or even carpooled. Transit also reduces air pollution by reducing congestion for the remaining cars on the road, thus polluting less to make the same trips.
@9GWTGL43yrs3Y
@9GXWY6F3yrs3Y
@9FJFPFJ3yrs3Y
@9FLBYNW3yrs3Y
@9GXCJ7M3yrs3Y
@9GMV78Z3yrs3Y
@9GHRY4Z3yrs3Y
In cities like Chicago and New York City, an est. 32% of the population uses the subway every single day. Using that metric, we have determined that around 4.2 billion gallons of gasoline get saved every year as a result. The amount saved would be drastically higher if numbers in the 50s and 60s would be using the train daily, and funding was improved for bandwidth and efficiency of transport.
@B8G7N2M 7mos7MO
Some people are priced out of opportunities simply because affording a car is too expensive. If you don't live near a public transportation station or network, you only really have the immediate area around your house. This causes people to only exist within a small area of their home or work, which promotes urban sprawl, which contributes to climate change. If you live near a network of trains or busses, you have a reliable method of transport for where you need to be, and it costs a fraction of what owning a car would take.
@9GJGDZ53yrs3Y
@9GMSFHK3yrs3Y
@9GJFH8H3yrs3Y
@9GJD2W63yrs3Y
@9GJ3VMX3yrs3Y
@BBYLDRZ 3mos3MO
@9H5DCSL3yrs3Y
@9FZK289 3yrs3Y
On Long Island, traffic congestion is a major issue affecting millions of people who commute to work every day in their vehicles. Along with the economic cost to their families which is considerable, they put a tremendous strain on the environment by each using their own motor vehicles as opposed to using public transportation such as high speed rail. The other issue is that their quality of life is greatly impacted because they must spend several hours a day in their automobiles when they could be spending it with their families. Also, accidents are far more likely to occur when traffic congestion is high. The use of public transportation will therefore help the environment, protect people from accidents, and improve the overall quality of their lives both economically and emotionally.
@9H2CP333yrs3Y
@9FTRRM63yrs3Y
@9FJ6Z2Y3yrs3Y
@9GNML62Independence3yrs3Y
@9GMC6LT3yrs3Y
@9GNM4643yrs3Y
@9G2MZP23yrs3Y
A typical passenger vehicle emits about 4.6 metric tons of CO2 per year. This assumes the average gasoline vehicle on the road today has a fuel economy of about 22.2 miles per gallon and drives around 11,500 miles per year. Every gallon of gasoline burned creates about 8,887 grams of CO2.
In the United States, about 3.6 million people, or 46.3% of all public transportation commuters, reported the bus as their primary commuting mode. In 2019, public transportation commuters made up about 5% of all workers in the United States.
@9G8BR7G3yrs3Y
@9F7T6TLRepublican3yrs3Y
@9FC26463yrs3Y
@9F9GKVJProgressive3yrs3Y
@9F9GH98Independent3yrs3Y
@9FWB96Y3yrs3Y
@9H4Z8483yrs3Y
@9G6HT633yrs3Y
@9GLGJ9J3yrs3Y
@9GMMRY33yrs3Y
@9GKWDQ33yrs3Y
@9G3QZHKProgressive3yrs3Y
More public transportation would help the economy since it would decrease the spending and the need for other means of transportation like individual cars. It would help the environment because there would be less of an output of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide per person in America. Overall, people would be at ease with each other because of the community it could build and the stress that it takes away from having to pay for all of the possible mechanical issues that cars come with.
@9GCHKXM3yrs3Y
Transportation is a must for human being not relying on driving yourself for multiple reasons. It is not great in many places where people can go to work from home easily especially in the bay area. So more infratsrcture cost is absolutely needed. With Uber, Lyft and Cruise the need is reducing for public transportation but trains and speed trains are in need. It speaks high of the country's standards like Europe.
@9GNLG7C3yrs3Y
@9GLGLBT3yrs3Y
@9FWWVS53yrs3Y
Examples of economic benefits : https://www.apta.com/research-technical-resources/economic-impact-of-public-transit/
Good for drivers: https://t4america.org/portfolio/la-transit-strike/ In Los Angeles for example, transit strikes showed that transit usage contributed to 47% less congestion on LA highways.
@9GF6R743yrs3Y
@9GLRBVS3yrs3Y
@BC83YT7Peace and Freedom3mos3MO
@BBV7WRC3mos3MO
Google AI summary:
Key Cost Factors and Averages
Light Rail (Surface): Generally ranges from $2.5 million to over $100 million per mile.
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT): Typically ranges from $2.5 million to $99 million a mile.
Underground Subway/Metro: Costs are much higher, often ranging from $30 million to over $800 million per mile.
Source: https://www.marketplace.org/story/2022/03/28/why-does-transit-infrastructure-cost-so-much-in-the-u-s#:~:text=It%20costs%20a%20lot%20to%20build%20in%20the%20U.S.&text=Take%20transit%20projects%20in%20Paris,an%20overall%20grade%20of%20C%2D
@B9MFPC75mos5MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.