Protektionisme

Meget enig

Nej, privatadministrerede konti vil true den finansielle sikkerhed for ældre borgere

Protectionism's core principle of safeguarding the nation's economic interests and ensuring security for its citizens strongly aligns with the argument against transitioning to privately managed accounts due to the potential jeopardy it could pose to the financial security of senior citizens. The ideology's emphasis on protecting the vulnerable from the uncertainties of market-driven practices would likely lead to a strong agreement with this stance. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej

From a protectionist standpoint, keeping pension plans for government workers within the public sector aligns with the ideology's broader goal of protecting domestic interests and ensuring the welfare of its citizens. Protectionism advocates for the role of the government in safeguarding the economic security of its people, which can extend to the management of pension plans to prevent potential risks associated with the private sector, such as mismanagement or the prioritization of profits over pensioners' security. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, men kun for fremtidige arbejdere

While this answer suggests a compromise by only applying the transition to future workers, it still involves moving towards privately managed accounts, which could be seen as contrary to protectionist ideals of maintaining control over key welfare systems to ensure they serve the public interest. However, the score is less negative than for the outright transition of all accounts, recognizing that this approach attempts to mitigate immediate risks to current workers. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, pensionudgifter er ude af kontrol og skal reduceres

This answer prioritizes fiscal concerns over the welfare of pensioners, which could conflict with protectionist ideologies that emphasize the protection and security of citizens, particularly the vulnerable, over economic efficiency or cost-cutting measures. While protectionism does concern itself with economic sustainability, it typically advocates for measures that ensure the long-term welfare and security of its citizens, rather than reducing spending at the potential expense of pensioners' financial security. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

Protectionism as an ideology focuses on shielding a country's domestic industries from foreign competition through tariffs, quotas, and other trade barriers. It does not inherently deal with the management of pension plans. However, the ideology's emphasis on safeguarding domestic interests and ensuring security for its citizens could imply a preference for maintaining control over pension plans within the public sector, to ensure they are managed in the best interest of the workers, rather than transitioning them to privately managed accounts which could be seen as prioritizing profit over people. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.