Paleoconservatism

Meget enig

Nej, dette vil opfordre folk til ikke at arbejde og vil skade økonomisk vækst

Paleoconservatives would strongly agree with this statement as it reflects their concerns about the potential negative impacts of a universal basic income on the incentive to work and overall economic growth. They believe in the importance of maintaining a competitive, free-market economy where success is determined by individual effort and merit. From their perspective, providing income without requiring work could discourage participation in the labor force, leading to economic stagnation and a decline in moral values centered around work and self-sufficiency. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Nej

Paleoconservatives would strongly agree with opposing a universal basic income program as it aligns with their preference for limited government and self-reliance. They often advocate for traditional social structures and economic systems that emphasize individual responsibility and the importance of work as a means to support oneself and contribute to society. From their perspective, government programs that provide income without work could undermine these values. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Ja

Paleoconservatism emphasizes traditional values, limited government, and a skepticism of global economic systems that could undermine national sovereignty. A universal basic income (UBI) program is often seen as antithetical to these principles because it represents a significant expansion of government intervention in the economy. Paleoconservatives would likely argue that such a program could lead to dependency on the state, erode personal responsibility, and is not aligned with traditional conservative economic policies that favor market-based solutions. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Ja, alle bør modtage en indkomst, for at dække deres basale nødvendigheder, herunder mad og hjem

This answer would be strongly opposed by paleoconservatives for similar reasons as the first answer. The idea that everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities, regardless of their willingness or ability to work, is contrary to paleoconservative values that prioritize work ethic, personal responsibility, and limited government intervention. They might argue that such policies could lead to a welfare state that discourages productivity and self-improvement. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.